Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.06.23.599676

Enhancing PDAC Therapy: Decitabine-Olaparib Synergy Targets KRAS-Dependent Tumors

Abstract

Current chemotherapies provide limited clinical benefits to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), partly due to the lack of effective biomarkers for personalized therapy. KRAS activating mutations occur in almost 90% of PDAC cases, leading to a subset of tumors dependent on KRAS for survival (dKRAS). Assessing dKRAS in PDAC can be achieved using gene expression signature scores, independent of specific KRAS mutations, allowing for personalized therapies. Previous studies have shown that dKRAS-PDAC cells are more sensitive to the FDA-approved drug decitabine (DEC), although the mechanism remains unclear. While DEC is approved for hematological tumors, its repurposing in solid tumors poses challenges due to high-dose hematological side effects. Identifying optimal pharmacological approaches and response biomarkers is crucial for the successful clinical implementation of DEC in PDAC and other solid tumors. Our investigation revealed that low-dose DEC combined with the PARP inhibitor olaparib (OLA) enhances antitumor activity in dKRAS-PDAC. Mechanistically, DEC induces DNA damage and activates an ATR/ATM-mediated DNA damage response (DDR), with PARP1-mediated DNA repair playing a crucial role. Inhibiting PARP activity with OLA enhances antitumor activity, even in BRCA1/2wild-type and homologous recombination (HR)-proficient tumors, but it is ineffective in KRAS-independent tumors. Thus, transcriptomic-based KRAS dependency scores effectively predict the efficacy of combined therapy. Additionally, in dKRAS-PDAC tumors carrying a BRCA2 mutation, low-dose DEC enhances OLAs antitumor activity, completely inhibiting metastasis growth compared to single-drug treatments. Our findings support further clinical evaluation of DEC+OLA combination therapy in PDAC, particularly in dKRAS-positive tumors, irrespective of BRCA1/2 status. This approach extends the clinical benefit of OLA beyond BRCA status, addressing a limitation in targeted PARP inhibitor therapies. Furthermore, we highlight DDR as a key mechanism of action for DEC, beyond its role in gene expression regulation, underscoring the mode of action of this widely used anticancer drug.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anastasio, G., Felaco, M., Lamolinara, A., Del Pizzo, F., Cacciagrano, E., Mottini, C., Mutarelli, M., Di Modugno, F., Iezzi, M., Cardone, L.. 2024-06-28. Enhancing PDAC Therapy: Decitabine-Olaparib Synergy Targets KRAS-Dependent Tumors. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.23.599676

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

m6A-Driven Intratumoral Cholesterol Biosynthesis Fuels Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression

Both nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) machinery are indispensable for proper cellular function. Although their collaborative roles in the nuclear export of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) have been reported, it remains ambiguous whether and how this collaboration may contribute to cancer progression. Here we identify a functional cooperation between NPCs and m6A signaling that promotes the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We showed that nuclear export of m6A-modified mRNAs, mediated by the interaction between RNA methyltransferase METTL3 and the nucleoporin NUP93, is functionally coupled to cholesterol biosynthesis. Given that cholesterol-fueled intratumoral androgen production is one of the mechanisms driving CRPC, we demonstrated that overexpression of the wild-type METTL3 or NUP93, but neither the enzymatically dead METTL3 nor the mutant NUP93 that loses METTL3-interacting capability, elevates intracellular levels of androgens, activates AR signaling under castrate condition, and promotes androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 or targeted demethylation on mRNAs encoding key cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes effectively suppressed CRPC malignancy. Together, these findings uncover a therapeutically targetable m6A-METTL3-NUP93 axis that links nuclear mRNA export and metabolic reprogramming to fuel CRPC progression, providing a conceptually new strategy for the treatment of this lethal disease.

cancer biology↗

ST6Gal2 promotes α2,6-sialylation and aggressive phenotypes in neuroblastoma cells

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Its clinical behavior ranges from spontaneous regression to lethal, treatment-refractory disease. Aberrant 2,6-sialylation contributes to aggressive phenotypes in many cancers, but the role of ST6Gal2, a neural-enriched 2,6-sialyltransferase, in neuroblastoma is largely unexplored. Here, we examine the clinical and functional significance of ST6Gal2 in neuroblastoma. In two independent public cohorts (SEQC, n=498; Kocak, n=649), high ST6GAL2 expression was associated with significantly worse overall and event-free survival. In the SEQC cohort, ST6GAL2 expression was higher in high-risk and MYCN-amplified tumors, varied across International Neuroblastoma Staging System stages, and correlated positively with a mesenchymal transcriptional signature (Spearman {rho}=0.181). The mesenchymal correlation was reproduced in the Kocak cohort ({rho}=0.204). Stable shRNA-mediated knockdown of ST6GAL2 in SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells reduced proliferation and viability, impaired wound closure, and decreased migration and invasion. In preliminary experiments in SK-N-AS cells, ST6GAL2 knockdown reduced binding of Sambucus nigra agglutinin, consistent with a role for ST6Gal2 in 2,6-sialylation. Together, these findings link ST6Gal2 expression to aggressive clinical and transcriptional features and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes in neuroblastoma and nominate ST6Gal2-mediated sialylation as a candidate pathway for mechanistic study.

cancer biology↗

Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis of paired pre- and post-treatment specimens reveals divergent chemoimmunomodulatory induction trajectories in breast cancer

The immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy (chemoimmunomodulation; CIM) are clinically consequential and heterogeneous, yet no systematic framework exists for classifying the immunomodulatory trajectory a tumor follows in response to treatment (CIM trajectory). Here, we present the CIM Induction Classifier (CIMIC), an unsupervised clustering pipeline leveraging delta gene expression across 3,189 CIM-related genes to classify specimens chemoimmunomodulatory trajectory. Applied to two pre- and post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) datasets (NKI/SMC, N = 36; NEO, N = 19) and nine epirubicin-perturbed triple-negative BC (TNBC) cell lines, CIMIC identified two divergent CIM trajectories: a functional CIM (Fun-CIM) trajectory, broadly conserved across tumors and cell lines and characterized by induction of inflammatory cell death, antigen presentation, viral mimicry, and adaptive immune activation programs, and a dysfunctional CIM (Dys-CIM) trajectory, characterized by induction of proteostatic and metabolic stress-adaptation programs, reduced immune cell abundances and cytotoxic activity, and enrichment of aggressive BC subtypes. Using survival and longitudinal transcriptomic data in NKI/SMC (N = 20), treatment-induced increases in Fun-CIM-associated genes and ssGSEA scores were associated with reduced recurrence, whereas Dys-CIM-associated genes and scores were associated with increased recurrence. In multivariable analyses within independent chemotherapy-treated BC cohorts (METABRIC, N = 412; SCAN-B, N = 2,462), higher baseline Fun-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with better outcomes, whereas higher baseline Dys-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with worse outcomes. These findings establish CIM as a dynamic, trajectory-level process and position CIMIC as a framework for defining CIM trajectories and supporting future efforts to identify predictors, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies that maximize beneficial CIM.

cancer biology↗