Directionality bias is necessary to explain spatiotemporal progression of pathology in mouse models of tauopathy

Abstract

Mounting evidence implicates trans-synaptic connectome-based spread as a shared mechanism behind different tauopathic conditions, yet also suggests there is divergent spatiotemporal progression between them. A potential parsimonious explanation for this apparent contradiction could be that different conditions incur differential rates and directional biases in tau transmission along fiber tracts. In this meta-analysis we closely examined this hypothesis and quantitatively tested it using spatiotemporal tau pathology patterns from 11 distinct models across 4 experimental studies. For this purpose, we extended a network-based spread model by incorporating net directionality along the connectome. Our data unambiguously supports the directional transmission hypothesis. First, retrograde bias is an unambiguously better predictor of tau progression than anterograde bias. Second, while spread exhibits retrograde character, our best-fitting biophysical models incorporate the mixed effects of both retrograde- and anterograde-directed spread, with notable tau-strain-specific differences. We also found a nontrivial association between directionality bias and tau strain aggressiveness, with more virulent strains exhibiting less retrograde character. Taken together, our study implicates directional transmission bias in tau transmission along fiber tracts as a general feature of tauopathy spread and a strong candidate explanation for the diversity of spatiotemporal tau progression between conditions. This simple and parsimonious mechanism may potentially fill a critical gap in our knowledge of the spatiotemporal ramification of divergent tauopathies.