Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.01.18.576164

Springs vs. motors: Ideal assistance in the lower limbs during walking at different speeds

Luis, I.·Afschrift, M.·Gutierrez-Farewik, E. M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed breakthroughs in assistive exoskeletons; both passive and active devices have reduced metabolic costs near preferred walking speed by assisting muscle actions. Metabolic reductions at multiple speeds should thus also be attainable. Musculoskeletal simulation can potentially predict the interaction between assistive moments, muscle-tendon mechanics, and walking energetics. In this study, we simulated devices optimal assistive moments based on minimal muscle activations during walking with prescribed kinematics and dynamics. We used a generic musculoskeletal model with calibrated muscle-tendon parameters and computed metabolic rates from muscle actions. We then simulated walking across multiple speeds and with two ideal actuation modes - motor-based and spring-based - to assist ankle plantarflexion, knee extension, hip flexion, and hip abduction and compared computed metabolic rates. We found that both actuation modes considerably reduced physiological joint moments but did not always reduce metabolic rates. Compared to unassisted conditions, motor-based ankle plantarflexion and hip flexion assistance reduced metabolic rates, and this effect was more pronounced as walking speed increased. Spring-based hip flexion and abduction assistance increased metabolic rates at some walking speeds despite a moderate decrease in some muscle activations. Both modes of knee extension assistance reduced metabolic rates to a small extent, even though the actuation contributed with practically the entire net knee extension moment during stance. Motor-based hip abduction assistance reduced metabolic rates more than spring-based assistance, though this reduction was relatively small. Future work should experimentally validate the effects of assistive moments and refine modeling assumptions accordingly. Our computational workflow is freely available online. Author SummaryWe used simulation to identify ideal assistance at major lower limb joints that can potentially be produced by motor-based or spring-based assistive devices in slow, normal, and fast walking. We found that assistance from both actuation modes decreased muscle activations and net muscle moments to varying extents, depending on joint and walking speed, but they did not always reduce metabolic energy of muscles. Motor-based assistance was overall more effective than spring-based assistance, and spring-based assistance at times increased the metabolic energy. The largest metabolic energy reductions occurred with motor-based plantarflexion assistance, followed by motor-based hip flexion assistance, both more notably at higher speeds. Motor-based hip abduction assistance also reduced metabolic energy, somewhat inversely with walking speed. Spring-based assistance was overall less effective than motor-based assistance but did reduce metabolic energy with plantarflexion assistance in slow walking and with hip flexion assistance in fast walking. Knee extension assistance, regardless of actuation mode or walking speed, had little to no influence on metabolic energy. Our simulation findings do not support knee extension assistance at all, nor spring-based hip flexion assistance in slow walking or hip abduction assistance at any speed if a device goal is to reduce muscle activations.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

bioengineeringPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luis, I., Afschrift, M., Gutierrez-Farewik, E. M.. 2024-01-22. Springs vs. motors: Ideal assistance in the lower limbs during walking at different speeds. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.576164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

RNASeek: A Cross-Phyla Generative Foundation Model for Multipurpose RNA Modeling and Reinforcement Learning-Based Design

RNA plays central roles in regulating information flow and provides a versatile substrate for engineering biological functions. While large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing and protein design, a general framework connecting RNA foundation models to functional sequence design remains limited. Here, we present RNASeek, a 1.6-billion-parameter generative foundation model built on a DeepSeek architecture and trained on a cross-phyla transcriptomic corpus for RNA sequence representation and generation. Natural-language tokens enable flexible conditional prediction and sequence design using a unified backbone. RNASeek captures species-specific transcript features and intron-exon boundaries in a zero-shot setting. We then fine-tune RNASeek to predict ribozyme self-cleavage activity and viral mRNA stability, revealing interpretable sequence features associated with function, including ribozyme loop flexibility and stem stability, as well as AU-rich motifs associated with mRNA stability. We use these functional predictors as reward models and apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to update the generation policy of RNASeek toward sequences with desired properties. GRPO-guided generation produces faster-cleaving ribozymes and stability-enhancing 3' UTRs while satisfying user-specified IUPAC constraints. Experimentally validated RNASeek-generated ribozymes achieve wild-type levels of activity, while RNASeek-generated 3' UTR sequences exceed the performance of the training data and benchmarked AI-generated 3' UTRs. Together, RNASeek establishes a unified pretrain-predict-optimize framework that connects learned RNA function to controllable de novo sequence design and provides a general strategy for engineering regulatory RNAs with desired properties.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Joint Vector Flow Mapping and Segmentation: Ill-Posedness,Differentiable Bayesian Inference, and Synthetic Vortex-FlowBenchmarks

Vector flow mapping (VFM) reconstructs left-ventricular (LV) blood velocity from color-Doppler echocardiography by combining the measured beamwise component with physical and regularizing constraints. Analysis of the discrete VFM formulation shows that the inverse problem is intrinsically ill posed: the occurrence of singular modes can be predicted from the geometry of the segmented blood-pool domain, the imposed boundary conditions, and the degree of smoothing. These modes can propagate uncertainty along entire transverse bands of the reconstructed velocity field, yet conventional VFM neither quantifies this uncertainty nor allows for correcting the blood-pool segmentation. We introduce Bayesian VFM (B--VFM), a hierarchical framework that jointly infers radial and transverse velocities, a probabilistic blood-pool mask, their spatially resolved uncertainties, and hyperparameters weighting Doppler and segmentation fidelity, mass conservation, boundary conditions, and smoothness. The discretized posterior admits a closed-form gradient and exact Hessian, enabling computationally efficient, gradient-based MAP estimation, sampling, and direct analysis of ill-posed modes. Posterior inference combines Gibbs sampling of conjugate Gamma-distributed hyperparameters with conditional maximum-a-posteriori estimation and a Laplace approximation for the high-dimensional velocity and mask fields. To accommodate systematic departures from planar mass conservation, B-VFM can learn the covariance of the planar divergence residual from an ensemble of flows and incorporate it as a structured model-discrepancy prior. Independent chains converged reproducibly, while covariance priors learned from flow ensembles illustrated how model discrepancies can be incorporated into the inference. B--VFM was evaluated using Lamb-Chaplygin dipoles under ideal conditions and with Doppler corruption, Doppler voids, and segmentation defects, and using the Hicks-Moffatt family of spherical vortices to assess violations of planar mass conservation. The method produced smooth reconstructions, localized uncertainty near unreliable measurements and regions of model inconsistency, and used flow information to correct segmentation errors. Within the tested vortex family, the data-informed planar divergence prior reduced velocity bias and mask distortion. B--VFM thus provides an uncertainty-aware reconstruction method and a flexible foundation for future VFM formulations incorporating additional priors, observations, and physical models. Future work will evaluate the method using clinical data and more complex three-dimensional benchmark flows.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Computational design of a versatile, zero-radius proximity labeling enzyme

The ability to map protein interactomes and organelle proteomes is foundational for achieving a molecular understanding of living cells. Proximity labeling (PL) provides a powerful strategy for this, but existing enzymes and photocatalysts are limited by their spatial resolution, reliance on biotin, and/or in vivo compatibility. Here we report FlexID, an engineered promiscuous ligase that catalyzes the rapid attachment of diverse small-molecule probes to proximal endogenous proteins. Critically, FlexID operates through a zero-radius, direct-contact mechanism, offering superior spatial precision compared to existing PL tools. We engineered FlexID by combining the strengths of sequence- and structure-trained computational models to enhance its catalytic activity and structural stability. Biophysical analysis revealed that specific conformational changes in FlexID improve its ability to recognize diverse target proteins while simultaneously preventing the premature release of the reactive intermediate. We demonstrate FlexID's versatility through in vivo proximity labeling, comprehensive organelle proteome mapping, and a high-throughput, fluorescence-based screen for molecular glues. Our work shows that computational methods can be harnessed to create mechanistically distinct PL enzymes and establishes FlexID as a flexible, high-resolution tool for mapping protein interactions and proteomes in living cells.

bioengineering↗