The impact of kinship composition on social structure

Pereira, A. D. S.; Pavez-Fox, M. A.; Hart, J. D. A.; Negron-Del Valle, J. E.; Phillips, D.; Casanova, C.; De Moor, D.; Brent, L. J. N.

doi:10.1101/2024.01.11.575037

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.01.11.575037

The impact of kinship composition on social structure

Pereira, A. D. S.·Pavez-Fox, M. A.·Hart, J. D. A.·Negron-Del Valle, J. E.·Phillips, D.·Casanova, C.·De Moor, D.·Brent, L. J. N.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The relatedness between group members is a potential driver of variation in social structure. Relatedness predicts biases in partner choice and formation of strong relationships among group members. As such, groups that differ in their percentage of non-kin dyads, i.e., in their kinship composition, should therefore differ in the structure of their social networks. Yet the relationship between kinship composition and social structure remains unclear. Here, we used long-term social and pedigree data from a population of rhesus macaques to investigate the relationship between kinship composition and the connectivity, cohesion, potential for transmission and social differentiation of the social networks of adult female macaques. We found no evidence that the social structure of groups composed of greater proportion of unrelated females differ from that of groups with a lower proportion of non-kin. To investigate this unexpected finding, we built agent-based models parameterised with the empirical data to further explore (1) the expected relationship between kinship composition and social structure and (2) why we did not find such a relationship in the empirical data. Agent-based models showed that kinship composition can influence social structure in populations similar to the one studied, but that this effect may only be detectable with a sample size even larger than ours (19 group-years) and with greater variance in kinship composition (proportion of non-kin varied between 0.830-0.922 in the empirical data). The relationship between kinship composition and social structure might be more apparent when comparing data from species that differ strongly in their social organisation, translating into marked differences in kinship composition. This further emphasises the importance of reporting existing and future kinship composition data to deepen our understanding of the evolution of sociality and highlights the potential of agent-based models to better understand empirical results.

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognition Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Pereira, A. D. S., Pavez-Fox, M. A., Hart, J. D. A., Negron-Del Valle, J. E., Phillips, D., Casanova, C., De Moor, D., Brent, L. J. N.. 2024-01-12. The impact of kinship composition on social structure. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.11.575037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict

The costs and benefits of sociality depend in part upon the size of groups. Therefore, individual behavior should vary across groups of different sizes, reflecting group size-dependent costs and benefits. Here, we test this prediction using a long-term dataset on wild female baboons (Papio cynocephalus x P. anubis). We find that individuals who live in larger groups suffer social costs: compared to animals in smaller groups, they experience more agonistic interactions, fewer grooming interactions, and sparser social networks. These social costs arise, in part, from a pattern in which relationships within dyads become more agonistic as group size increases (i.e., a given dyad exhibits fewer grooming interactions relative to agonistic interactions when it is living in a larger group). While individuals in large groups generally maintain the same number of strong bonds as individuals in small groups, they tend to develop weak bonds with a greater number of social partners that results in, on average, weaker bonds overall. Our results demonstrate that, despite potential benefits to large groups in terms of predation risk and intergroup competition, the social lives of individuals in larger groups involve less affiliation and more conflict in this wild primate population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗