Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.01.02.573986

Germinal Center Cytokines Driven Epigenetic Control of Epstein-Barr Virus Latency Gene Expression

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) persistently infects 95% of adults worldwide and is associated with multiple human lymphomas that express characteristic EBV latency programs used by the virus to navigate the B-cell compartment. Upon primary infection, the EBV latency III program, comprised of six Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigens (EBNA) and two Latent Membrane Protein (LMP) antigens, drives infected B-cells into germinal center (GC). By incompletely understood mechanisms, GC microenvironmental cues trigger the EBV genome to switch to the latency II program, comprised of EBNA1, LMP1 and LMP2A and observed in GC-derived Hodgkin lymphoma. To gain insights into pathways and epigenetic mechanisms that control EBV latency reprogramming as EBV-infected B-cells encounter microenvironmental cues, we characterized GC cytokine effects on EBV latency protein expression and on the EBV epigenome. We confirmed and extended prior studies highlighting GC cytokine effects in support of the latency II transition. The T-follicular helper cytokine interleukin 21 (IL-21), which is a major regulator of GC responses, and to a lesser extent IL-4 and IL-10, hyper-induced LMP1 expression, while repressing EBNA expression. However, follicular dendritic cell cytokines including IL-15 and IL-27 downmodulate EBNA but not LMP1 expression. CRISPR editing highlighted that STAT3 and STAT5 were necessary for cytokine mediated EBNA silencing via epigenetic effects at the EBV genomic C promoter. By contrast, STAT3 was instead necessary for LMP1 promoter epigenetic remodeling, including gain of activating histone chromatin marks and loss of repressive polycomb repressive complex silencing marks. Thus, EBV has evolved to coopt STAT signaling to oppositely regulate the epigenetic status of key viral genomic promoters in response to GC cytokine cues. Author SummaryA longstanding question has remained how Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) epigenetically switches between latency programs as it navigates the B-cell compartment. EBV uses its latency III program to stimulate newly infected B cell growth and then trafficking into secondary lymphoid tissue germinal centers (GC). In latency III, the viral C promoter stimulates expression of six Epstein-Barr nuclear antigens (EBNA) that in turn induce two latent membrane proteins (LMP). However, knowledge has remained incomplete about how GC microenvironmental cues trigger switching to latency II, where only one EBNA and two LMP are expressed, a program observed in Hodgkin lymphoma. Building on prior evidence that GC cytokines are a major cue, we systematically tested effects of cytokines secreted by GC-resident T follicular helper and follicular dendritic cells on EBV latency gene expression and on epigenetic remodeling of their promoters. This highlighted that a range of GC cytokines repress latency III EBNA, while only several support LMP1 expression, major events in the transition between the latency III and II programs. We identified key downstream roles of JAK/STAT signaling in relaying cytokine signals to the EBV epigenome, including obligatory STAT3 and 5 roles in rewiring of C and LMP promoter histone epigenetic marks.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Liao, Y., Yan, J., Beri, N. R., Roth, L. G., Cesarman, E., Gewurz, B.. 2024-01-03. Germinal Center Cytokines Driven Epigenetic Control of Epstein-Barr Virus Latency Gene Expression. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.02.573986

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Rapid and largely reversible shifts in the canine fecal metabolome during dietary change

Diet can rapidly change the fecal metabolome, but less is known about recovery after the original diet is restored. We used untargeted UPLC-MS metabolomics to analyze 72 fecal samples from nine Pumi dogs during an owner-managed switch from dry food to raw food and back to dry food. Diet phase accounted for a large proportion of variation in both ionization modes. More than 13,000 LC-MS features changed at the first sampling point after the switch to raw food, with a similarly large response after return to dry food. Among features significant in both comparisons, more than 99% changed in opposite directions. At the final sampling point, no positive-mode (ESI+) features and only 13 negative-mode (ESI-) features differed from the second dry-food baseline under the same threshold. BARF-associated patterns persisted in analyses excluding individual dogs and in pedigree-adjusted candidate models, although individual feature effects depended on normalization. Putative metabolites from several biochemical classes differed in their response and recovery. The fecal metabolome therefore changed rapidly and returned largely toward baseline, with differences among dogs.

microbiology↗

Taxonomic and functional concordance between full-length ONT 16S and ONT shotgun metagenomics in the canine gut microbiome

Background: Full-length Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) 16S rRNA sequencing provides a scalable view of microbial community composition and can support phylogeny-based functional prediction, but it is not equivalent to shotgun metagenomics. We asked which biological conclusions are preserved when the same canine fecal specimens are profiled by full-length ONT 16S and ONT whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing, and how their agreement depends on analytical scale, reference representation and classifier. Methods: Ninety-seven fecal specimens from 51 dogs were profiled with both assays from the same DNA extract. Functional profiles predicted from NanoASV/NanoPredict with PICRUSt2 were compared with WGS-supported KEGG Ortholog (KO) profiles generated by Kadath. Taxonomy was benchmarked in a source-genome-matched RefSeq universe and in a host-specific DogMAG universe using minitax and Kraken2. Agreement was evaluated at whole-profile, feature-abundance, detection, between-sample structure and biological-inference scales. Age-associated transfer was assessed with dog-aware continuous mixed models, grouped signed-score analyses and paired/dog-blocked PERMANOVA. Results: Functional whole-profile concordance was high: median within-sample CLR Spearman correlations ranged from 0.781 to 0.860 across developmental strata, while between-sample functional structure remained significant by Mantel (rho=0.543) and Procrustes (r=0.693; both p=0.001). Feature-wise transfer was substantially weaker (median KO-wise CLR Spearman=0.318). Continuous age-associated KO slopes showed substantial cross-assay concordance (Spearman=0.727; signed-score Spearman=0.753; direction agreement=77.9%), although 1,290/5,258 eligible KOs retained significant assay-by-age interactions. Taxonomically, exact genus/species abundance agreement was much lower than agreement in between-sample ecological structure. Host-specific DogMAG improved species-level median Spearman from 0.261 to 0.656 for minitax SpeciesEstimate and from 0.181 to 0.512 for Kraken2. The classifier effect was independent of reference choice: under both RefSeq and DogMAG, minitax yielded stronger 16S-WGS concordance than Kraken2, with all eight prespecified RefSeq paired genus/species endpoints and all 10 DogMAG primary paired endpoints significant after BH correction. The same ordering extended to developmental inference, with DogMAG genus/species age-slope concordance of 0.795/0.799 for SpeciesEstimate versus 0.693/0.702 for Kraken2. Taxonomic Aitchison PERMANOVA detected age-associated structure in every assay/reference/classifier/rank combination, whereas age-by-assay interactions were consistently significant but small (R2 approximately 1.1 to 2.2%). Stricter NanoASV identity thresholds removed substantial 16S abundance without improving species-level agreement. Conclusions: The extent of cross-assay agreement depends on the level of analysis. Full-length ONT 16S preserves broad functional organization, ecological structure and much of the direction of age-associated change, but exact fine-rank composition, individual-feature abundance and effect magnitude remain assay dependent. Host-specific reference representation substantially narrows the taxonomic gap, and classifier choice exerts an additional independent effect: within the same matched reference set, minitax consistently yields stronger 16S-WGS concordance than Kraken2 across abundance, detection, ecological-distance and developmental-inference endpoints. Full-length ONT 16S is therefore well suited to broad ecological screening and hypothesis generation, whereas WGS remains preferable when conclusions depend on quantitative fine-rank composition, directly supported gene content or precise feature-level effect estimates.

microbiology↗

Matrix-controlled emergence of biofilm architecture shapes antimicrobial survival

Biofilms are structured microbial communities whose extracellular matrix is widely regarded as a basis of their protection against antimicrobial compounds. Yet how matrix production by individual bacteria gives rise to collective architecture and antimicrobial protection remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically varied expression of the master biofilm regulator csgD in Salmonella enterica and found that increasing matrix production reorganizes biofilms from dense, isotropic packings into sparse, nematically aligned communities by altering cell-cell interactions. By combining experimentally measured biofilm architectures with reaction-diffusion modeling, we show that these structural changes produce distinct patterns of antimicrobial killing, ranging from preferential killing near the liquid-biofilm interface to more uniform killing throughout the community. Consequently, increasing matrix production unexpectedly reduces antimicrobial survival by shifting the biofilm into different transport regimes, while strain-specific physiological differences further modulate antimicrobial depletion. Rather than acting as a passive barrier, EPS therefore shapes antimicrobial susceptibility by reorganizing biofilm architecture and its transport properties. EPS thus provides a physical link between molecular regulation, collective architecture and antimicrobial survival, providing a quantitative framework for understanding how cellular matrix production generates emergent biofilm function.

microbiology↗