Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.12.26.573350

Relentless Selection: The importance of within-generation selection in heterogeneous habitats

Abstract

Natural selection relentlessly reshapes the genetic and phenotypic composition of populations, yet often adaptations cannot emerge due to excessive migration and gene flow. Nevertheless, in heterogeneous habitats strong selection could temporarily establish significant trait divergence among environmental patches. Here, we show that in Fundulus heteroclitus, a single generation of selection drives significant phenotypic divergence (5-15%) in organismal metabolic rate, cardiac metabolic rate and hypoxia tolerance. This divergence occurs among individuals of the same panmictic population residing in environmentally distinct microhabitats. Phenotypic divergence remains observable following long-term common-gardening and is supported by previous work documenting fine-scale, genetic divergence among microhabitat residents. We show that the magnitude of within-generation trait divergence is on the order of what is commonly observed among more isolated populations that have diverged over multiple generations. Although panmictic reproduction among microhabitat residents erodes trait divergence every generation, strong selection could potentially reestablish it in the next. In heterogeneous habitats, transient, fine-scale divergence could have a considerable impact on eco-evolutionary dynamics. Ignoring its contribution to overall trait variance could limit our ability to define meaningful, evolved divergence. SummaryNatural selection can lead to changes in organisms traits over time. Typically, these changes occur slowly over multiple generations and over large spatial scales. By studying a wild population of Atlantic killifish, we show that a single generation of natural selection can generate substantial trait variation over short distances. We observe significant differences in several physiological traits among individuals inhabiting distinct microhabitats in a patchy salt marsh environment. These differences are unlikely due to physiological acclimation and are best explained by strong, natural selection removing those individuals not suited to a particular microhabitat. Previous studies support natural selection as the most likely explanation, having shown subtle genetic differences among microhabitat residents. Remarkably, the magnitude of trait divergence is on the order of what is typically observed among populations that have diverged over multiple generations and larger spatial scales. Our results highlight the significant contribution of natural selection to trait variation in patchy environments, even over exceptionally short time and small spatial scales.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ehrlich, M. A., DeLiberto, A. N., Drown, M. K., Oleksiak, M. F., Crawford, D. L.. 2023-12-26. Relentless Selection: The importance of within-generation selection in heterogeneous habitats. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.26.573350

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗