Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.12.20.572572

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger? Effects of paternal age at conception on fathers and sons

Abstract

Advancing male age is often hypothesised to reduce both male fertility and offspring quality through reproductive senescence. However, the effects of advancing male age on reproductive output and offspring quality need not always be deleterious. For example, older fathers might compensate for reproductive senescence by terminally investing in reproduction. Similarly, males that survive to reproduce at an old age, might carry alleles that confer high viability (viability selection) which are then inherited by offspring, or might have high reproductive potential (selective disappearance). Differentiating these mechanisms requires an integrated experimental study of paternal survival and reproductive performance, as well as offspring quality, which is currently lacking. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we test the effects of paternal age at conception (PAC) on paternal survival and reproductive success, and the lifespans of sons. We discover that mating at an old age is temporarily linked with decreased future male survival, suggesting that mating-induced mortality is possibly due to old fathers being frail. We also find a quadratic reproductive ageing pattern, with an onset of senescence in late-life. We discover no evidence for terminal investment, and instead discover positive covariances between a fathers lifespan and his probability of siring offspring, for older PAC groups. Lastly, we show that sons born to older fathers live longer than those born to younger fathers, due to viability selection. Collectively, our results suggest that effects of advancing PAC need not be deleterious for fathers or offspring, and can increase fitness if older fathers produce more viable offspring. Lay summaryIts often assumed that old fathers have fewer or lower-quality offspring than young fathers. However, old fathers have on average, usually survived to and reproduced at an older age than young fathers, which might be signals of high quality of old fathers, and benefit offspring. These opposing predictions have rarely been tested, and its unclear what their combined influence is, in determining the fathers and offsprings fitness. Using fruit flies, we explored how old paternal age affects a fathers reproduction and his sons lifespans. We find evidence for age-related reproductive decline in fathers. However, we also discover that fathers who mate at an older age live longer than fathers who mate at a younger age, and subsequently, the sons of older fathers live longer than sons of younger fathers. We suggest that the relationship between paternal age, paternal reproduction and lifespan, and offspring quality, is more complex than previously assumed, and that old fathers might provide benefits to their offspring that future studies need to consider. Teaser textIs an old dad really that bad? While old fathers might in some cases produce fewer offspring or offspring of worse quality than young fathers, they have also survived to an older age, thus might be of higher quality. We test how reproducing at an old age affects a father and his sons fitness. We show that old fathers show evidence of reproductive senescence, but, surprisingly, produce sons that are longer lived than the sons of young fathers. This effect is driven largely by old fathers themselves living longer than young fathers, thus possibly passing alleles conferring higher viability to their sons. Our research is important because it reveals specific mechanisms that drive multifaceted effects of age on fitness.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sanghvi, K., Pizzari, T., Sepil, I.. 2023-12-21. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger? Effects of paternal age at conception on fathers and sons. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.20.572572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Isoform inflation and annotation heterogeneity can confound Kunitz-repertoire comparisons in blood-feeding animals: a gene-level reappraisal

Hematophagy has arisen independently many times across Metazoa, and recurrent anticoagulant protein families in blood-feeders are often read as convergent recruitment - the Kunitz/BPTI domain a paradigm case, with the leech an oft-cited low-Kunitz exception. We re-examine this at the gene level and ask whether a confirmatory cross-phylum test of this blood-feeding/anticoagulant association is feasible with public genomes. Applying an auditable gene-level protocol (one longest-isoform representative per gene; conservation-checked protein to gene mapping) to eight metazoan lineages, we find no consistent, universal elevation of whole-genome gene-level Kunitz-repertoire size in these blood-feeders (blood-feeder median 18 genes vs non-blood-feeder median 39; a descriptive comparison of non-independent taxa, not a formal test). Protein-entry counts inflate gene-level Kunitz counts by up to ~4.6x (mosquito 23 to 5), and neither this inflation nor proteome-wide isoform density (1.0-2.7x) tracks diet, so protein-entry comparisons are an unreliable basis for repertoire claims. Separately, deterministic bookkeeping under a fixed topology and a no-reversal rule counts 12 independent blood-feeding origins (11 if the ancestral lamprey is treated as parasitic with two losses); a non-exhaustive screen of annotated public genomes yielded only one candidate blood/non-blood pair (bedbug), and, under the pre-registered simulation scenario, only a cross-origin heterogeneity endpoint is attainable within a realistic origin ceiling, and only under strong heterogeneity (among-origin SD >= 3-4). An exploratory, feasibility-grade secretome-composition estimate did not meet the pre-registered criterion. We offer a gene-level, annotation-aware re-analysis, a caution about isoform/annotation bias in cross-phylum comparisons, and an account of what current data can and cannot support.

evolutionary biology↗

Denisovan introgression left differential selection regimes in Humans and Neanderthals on the SLC30A9 gene

Signals of positive selection around the SLC30A9 gene have been reported in human populations outside Africa. Selection likely acted on a highly differentiated single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs1047626, leading to a non-synonymous substitution in the encoded zinc transporter. Because of the striking similarity between the putatively selected SLC30A9 haplotype observed in several current human populations and the Denisovan individual, previous work has proposed adaptive introgression. Yet alternative explanations, including ancient human variation, and the precise archaic source -Neanderthal or Denisovan- remained unresolved. Considering the potentially complex evolution of SLC30A9, we applied Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithms coupled to machine learning to investigate the most plausible evolutionary origin of this substitution. After modelling different evolutionary scenarios with forward-in-time simulations, our results highlight that the most probable scenario is a Denisovan origin of the rs1047626 polymorphism. However, the allele likely introgressed into Neanderthals first and was then passed into non-African modern humans. Moreover, the derived allele frequency for rs1047626 across several African populations is consistent with back-to-Africa migrations. Finally, our ABC analyses indicate strong positive selection in East Asian populations and other out-of-Africa populations, whereas in Neanderthal populations, the selection coefficient was probably neutral or slightly deleterious.

evolutionary biology↗

Distinct associative learning abilities for colour and odour in the flower-feeding Drosophila elegans and the fruit-feeding Drosophila melanogaster

Animal behaviour is both innately constrained and shaped by learning. This mosaic organization has evolved in response to species-specific ecological demands and may differ between sensory modalities. Flower-visiting animals are a particularly useful system for investigating the relationship between sensory ecology and learning because they rely on multiple floral cues, particularly odour and colour, to locate food sources. However, it remains largely unexplored whether specialization on floral resources entails divergence in learning abilities across sensory modalities. Drosophila elegans is a flower-feeding species that depends heavily on floral resources throughout its life; adults spend much of their time on flowers and larvae develop on fallen flower leaves. Here, we compared odour-reward and colour-reward associative learning between the flower-feeding D. elegans and the fruit-feeding D. melanogaster. We found that, under conditions of equilibrated motivation, odour- and colour-preference, and using the same sugar reward, D. elegans exhibited poorer odour-reward learning performance but better colour-reward learning performance than D. melanogaster. These results suggest that the modality-specific eligibility of sensory information to enter into associations, known as the 'Garcia-effect' in experimental psychology, can evolve oppositely between species. This highlights the relationship between ecological specialization and mnemonic processing, and shows that biological 'intelligence' is not general.

evolutionary biology↗