Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.12.04.569889

Non-instructed Motor Skill Learning in Monkeys: Insights from Deep Reinforcement Learning Models

Abstract

In the field of motor learning, few studies have addressed the case of non-instructed movement sequences learning, as they require long periods of training and data acquisition, and are complex to interpret. In contrast, such problems are readily addressed in machine learning, using artificial agents in simulated environments. To understand the mechanisms that drive the learning behavior of two macaque monkeys in a free-moving multi-target reaching task, we created two Reinforcement Learning (RL) models with different penalty criteria: "Time" reflecting the time spent to perfom a trial, and "Power" integrating the energy cost. The initial phase of the learning process is characterized by a rapid improvement in motor performance for both the 2 monkeys and the 2 models, with hand trajectories becoming shorter and smoother while the velocity gradually increases along trials and sessions. This improvement in motor performance with training is associated with a simplification in the trajectory of the movements performed to achieve the task goal. The monkeys and models show a convergent evolution towards an optimal circular motor path, almost exclusively in counter-clockwise direction, and a persistent inter-trial variability. All these elements contribute to interpreting monkeys learning in the terms of a progressive updating of action-selection patterns, following a classic value iteration scheme as in reinforcement learning. However, in contrast with our models, the monkeys also show a specific variability in the choice of the motor sequences to carry out across trials. This variability reflects a form of "path selection", that is absent in the models. Furthermore, comparing models and behavioral data also reveal sub-optimality in the way monkeys manage the trade-off between optimizing movement duration ("Time") and minimizing its metabolic cost ("Power"), with a tendency to overemphasize one criterion at the detriment of the other one. Overall, this study reveals the subtle interplay between cognitive factors, biomechanical constraints, task achievement and motor efficacy management in motor learning, and highlights the relevance of modeling approaches in revealing the respective contribution of the different elements at play. Author summaryThe way in which animals and humans learn new motor skills through free exploratory movements sequences solely governed by success or failure outcomes is not yet fully understood. Recent advances in machine learning techniques for continuous action spaces led us to construct a motor learning model investigate how animals progressively enhance the efficiency of their behaviors through numerous trials and errors. This study conducts a comprehensive comparison between deep learning models and experimental data from monkey behavior. Notably, we show that the progressive refinement of motor sequences, as they are observed in the animals, do not require the implementation of a complete model of their environment. Rather, it merely requires the capacity to anticipate both movement costs and final reward a few steps ahead in the future following a value iteration principle. Furthermore, the systematic deviations exhibited by the monkeys with respect to the computational model inform us on the presence of individual preferences in either minimizing the duration or the energy consumption, and also on the involvement of alternative "cognitive" strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carminatti, L., Condro, L., Riehle, A., Grün, S., Brochier, T., Dauce, E.. 2023-12-05. Non-instructed Motor Skill Learning in Monkeys: Insights from Deep Reinforcement Learning Models. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.04.569889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Who rests with whom? Sex composition and group demography shape resting associations in free-ranging dogs

Free-ranging dogs frequently rest near conspecifics, but the demographic factors structuring their resting associations remain poorly understood. We quantified dyadic resting associations in 26 free-ranging dog groups in West Bengal, India, observed between 2019 and 2023. Association strength was estimated from scan based resting co-occurrences using the Half-Weight Index. We tested whether dyadic association strength varied with dyad sex composition, dyad life stage composition, group size, and group sex ratio using a generalised additive model for location, scale and shape that accounted for group identity and repeated occurrence of individuals across dyads. Male-male dyads had lower association strengths than female-female dyads, whereas mixed-sex dyads did not differ from female-female dyads. Association strength decreased with increasing group size but increased as the male-to-female ratio within the group increased, while life-stage composition had no detectable effect. Individual level network metrics, including strength, reach, clustering coefficient, affinity, and eigenvector centrality, did not vary with sex or season. Mixed-sex pairs were also frequently represented among the strongest dyadic associations within groups. These findings indicate that resting associations in free-ranging dogs vary with dyad sex composition and group demography. Further opportunity-controlled analyses are required to determine whether the prominence of mixed-sex dyads reflects preferential association rather than group composition alone.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Exploring rhythmic and melodic preferences in budgerigars: Individual and possible sex-related variation

Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are vocal-learning birds with well-developed auditory abilities, but how they behaviorally evaluate melodic and rhythmic structure in sound sequences remains unclear. We examined whether budgerigars show preferences for these acoustic features and whether such preferences differ between the sexes. Three male and three female budgerigars were presented with four 8-s sound sequences in a preference apparatus: Simple (no pitch or temporal variation), Melody (pitch variation only), Rhythm (temporal variation only), and Complex (both pitch and temporal variation). Preference was quantified as the time spent in the area associated with each stimulus. No statistically significant differences among the four stimuli were detected within individuals. However, effect-size estimates indicated that two females spent more time with sequences containing rhythmic structure, whereas males showed no consistent preference related to either melodic or rhythmic components. Multidimensional scaling further suggested greater separation among stimulus conditions in females than in males. Consistent with this pattern, condition differentiation indices were higher in all three females than in all three males, although the sex difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest a possible sex-related difference in how budgerigars behaviorally weight temporal structure, with females showing greater differentiation among auditory sequence types under the present testing conditions.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Copulation calls indicate fertility but do not reflect female mate competition in wild Guinea baboons

Across different modalities, signals play a core role in attracting mates and influencing mating success. In several non-human primate species, females produce calls during mating that are thought to promote male competition over receptive females. The extent to which social system characteristics modulate the function of copulation calls remains less clear. We studied copulation calls in wild Guinea baboons (Papio papio), who live in a multilevel society structured around units in which females associate and mate almost exclusively with a single male. We hypothesised that females use copulation calls as an indirect form of mate competition, with competition increasing in larger units. In addition, we hypothesised that females are more likely to mate again after calling. We analysed 6116 copulations between 2014 and 2025, involving 99 reproductively active females and 78 subadult and adult males. Females produced copulation calls in 72.7% of copulations, with large inter-individual variation. Neither unit size nor its interaction with the female's swelling size or the presence of simultaneously receptive females affected the probability of calling. A survival analysis with a subset of the data (2353 copulations) revealed no effect of calling on the latency to the next mating. Our results render the hypothesis that female Guinea baboons use calls in indirect mate competition unlikely. Yet, the probability of calling varied with sexual swelling size, suggesting that calls signal female fertility. Possibly, Guinea baboon copulation calls represent an evolutionary remnant, no longer under selective pressure, and can be considered index signals of female fertility.

animal behavior and cognition↗