MolecularWebXR: Multiuser discussions about chemistry and biology in immersive and inclusive VR

Cortes Rodriguez, F. J.; Frattini, G.; Teixeira Pinto Meireles, F.; Terrien, D. A.; Cruz-Leon, S.; Dal Peraro, M.; Schier, E.; Moreno, D. M.; Abriata, L. A.

doi:10.1101/2023.11.01.564623

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.11.01.564623

MolecularWebXR: Multiuser discussions about chemistry and biology in immersive and inclusive VR

Cortes Rodriguez, F. J.·Frattini, G.·Teixeira Pinto Meireles, F.·Terrien, D. A.·Cruz-Leon, S.·Dal Peraro, M.·Schier, E.·Moreno, D. M.·Abriata, L. A.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

MolecularWebXR is a new website for education, science communication and scientific peer discussion in chemistry and biology, based on modern web-based Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). With no installs as it is all web-served, MolecularWebXR enables multiple users to simultaneously explore, communicate and discuss concepts about chemistry and biology in immersive 3D environments, by manipulating and passing around objects with their bare hands and pointing at different elements with natural hand gestures. User may either be present in the same real space or distributed around the world, in the latter case talking naturally with each other thanks to built-in audio features. Although MolecularWebXR is most immersive when running in the web browsers of high-end AR/VR headsets, its WebXR core also allows participation by users with consumer devices such as smartphones, possibly inserted into cardboard goggles for deeper immersivity, or even in computers and tablets. MolecularWebXR comes with preset VR rooms that cover topics from general, inorganic and organic chemistry, biophysics and structural biology, and general biology; besides, new content can be added at will through moleculARwebs PDB2AR tool or by contacting the lead authors. We verified MolecularWebXRs ease of use and versatility by people aged 12-80 years old in entirely virtual sessions or in mixed real-virtual sessions at various science outreach events, in courses at the bachelor, masters and early doctoral levels, in scientific collaborations, and in conference lectures. MolecularWebXR is available for free use without registration at https://molecularwebxr.org, and a blog post version of this preprint with embedded videos is available at https://go.epfl.ch/molecularwebxr-blog-post.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and education Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Cortes Rodriguez, F. J., Frattini, G., Teixeira Pinto Meireles, F., Terrien, D. A., Cruz-Leon, S., Dal Peraro, M., Schier, E., Moreno, D. M., Abriata, L. A.. 2023-11-02. MolecularWebXR: Multiuser discussions about chemistry and biology in immersive and inclusive VR. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.01.564623

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2024

Reading Outside the Lines: A Systematic Approach for Detecting Bias in Scientific Communication

Consciousness of the social impact of science and the potential biases of its authors is critical to understanding, interpreting, and using scientific findings responsibly. This is especially true for sciences concerned with human health and behavior, where societal and unconscious biases may reinforce existing inequities and discriminatory practices. Considering backgrounds and biases, we may notice bias influencing scientists methodological choices and conclusions, even when a work is otherwise scientifically sound. To this end, we created the pedagogical tool Finding inEquity in LIterature and eXperimentation (FELIX). FELIX is a tool that systematizes the detection of bias and subjectivity in scientific communications by using a three-phase progression of (i) Annotation, (ii) Analysis and (iii) Synthesis, where students form a unified argument about the text with a focus on its relationship to social or ethical context. Results from a mixed methods approach indicated the efficacy of our approach in supporting student learning related to reading comprehension, critical thinking skills, and in understanding the social and ethical implications of the research they were reading. We put forward FELIX as a universal method for training students in the reading of scientific communications and as a tool for addressing systemic inequities in science and science education.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2024

Beyond Pre-Post Surveys: Exploring Validity Evidence For The Use Of Experience Sampling Methods To Measure Student Anxiety In Introductory Biology

Classroom experiences elicit many emotions in students. Of these emotions, anxiety, or the feeling of uncertainty about a prospective event, has outsized impacts on students academic achievement and persistence. To understand the effects of student anxiety on student outcomes, education researchers often utilize single or dual-time point (e.g., pre-post) surveys. However, we posit that these methods have significant limitations, including the potential to miss variation in student emotions across time. One methodological solution to this problem is using experience sampling methods (ESM), or short, frequent surveys that capture student experiences as they occur. This study sought to provide evidence of validity for the use of ESM to measure student anxiety in Introductory Biology courses. We compared student anxiety data gathered via ESM and traditional survey methods (i.e., pre-post surveys) in terms of 1) differences in participant recruitment, 2) students experience of anxiety, and 3) the predictive ability on end-of-course outcomes. Our results revealed that: 1) Compared to non-ESM participants, the ESM group has significantly fewer men and had significantly higher perceptions of instructor support, 2) Average anxiety levels measured via ESM were lower and more variable than those measured via pre-post surveys, and 3) Post-survey measures of anxiety and average ESM measures of anxiety significantly predicted students final grade. We discuss the implications of these results for future applications of ESM and pre-post survey methods; specifically, we propose that ESM methods may be more advantageous than pre-post surveys in cases where researchers aim to understand intra-individual processes, like emotions.

scientific communication and education↗