Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.10.26.564127

Biomimetic computations improve neural network robustness

Abstract

Object recognition by natural and artificial sensory systems requires a combination of selectivity and invariance. Both natural and artificial neural networks achieve selectivity and invariance by propagating sensory information though layers of neurons organised in a functional hierarchy. Both employ computational units performing AND-like operations for selectivity and OR-like operations for invariance. However, while biological neurons are intrinsically capable of switching between these operations, their artificial counterparts are hard-wired to perform only one of them. We wanted to test whether the flexible mapping between neurons and computations observed in biological neural networks is compatible with, or perhaps even useful to, artificial neural networks. To answer this question, we have developed a deep learning layer in which both selectivity and invariance operations can be performed by the same neurons. As with biological neurons, the choice of which operation an artificial neuron performs on a given input can be governed by the input strength. This flexible layer successfully outputs a combination of the two operations and, surprisingly, confers additional robustness to adversarial examples, which are inputs deliberately crafted to promote misclassification. The flexible mapping also improves accuracy when the training dataset is small, as well as when data are corrupted by certain types of noise. These results narrow the gap between biological and artificial neural networks and add a new bio-inspired approach to the arsenal of defenses against adversarial examples, which are known threats to model-based optimization and network security. Author summaryThe biophysical properties of a biological neuron enable it to perform both OR-like and AND-like operations over its inputs. In contrast, artificial neural networks use units that always perform only one specific operation. We wondered whether the flexibility observed in individual biological neurons could be incorporated into artificial neural networks without breaking them. If artificial neural networks required their units to perform single operations, then this requirement would either point to a fundamental difference between biological and artificial neural networks or indicate that biological neurons are somehow constrained to perform only one type of operations during object recognition. If, on the other hand, artificial units can flexibly switch between different operations, then such a result would indicate that biological and artificial neural networks are more similar than previously thought and would be an important step towards biomimetic AI. To find out, we introduced a new computational structure we call a flexible layer, in which individual units can switch between operations according to a rule (e.g., depending on input strength, or even randomly). We found that inserting the flexible layer in one or several positions in different artificial neural networks trained on several benchmark datasets not only preserves their accuracy but also makes them more robust to various perturbations and improves learning when training data is scarce.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Evanson, L., Lavrov, M., Kharitonov, I., Lu, S., Kozlov, A.. 2023-10-31. Biomimetic computations improve neural network robustness. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.26.564127

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗