Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.10.11.561828

Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes

Hodzic, D.·D'Hulst, G.·Leuenberger, R.·Arnet, J.·Westerhuis, E.·Roth, R.·Schmidt-Trucksass, A.·Knaier, R.·Wagner, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

ObjectiveTo 1) establish extensive physiological profiles of highly-trained CrossFit athletes using gold-standard tests and 2) investigate which physiological markers best correlate with CrossFit(R) Open performance. MethodsThis study encompassed sixty participants (30 males and 30 females), all within the top 5% of the CrossFit(R) Open, including 7 CrossFit(R) Semi-finalists and 3 Games finalists. Isokinetic dynamometers were employed to measure maximum isometric and isokinetic leg and trunk strength. Countermovement jump height and maximum isometric mid-thigh pull strength were assessed on a force plate. V{square}O2peak was measured by a cardiopulmonary exercise test, while critical power and W were evaluated during a 3-minute all-out test, both on a cycle ergometer. ResultsMale and female athletes median (IQR) V{square}O2peak was 4.64 (4.43, 4.80) and 3.21 (3.10, 3.29) (L{middle dot}min-1), critical power 314.5 (285.9, 343.6) and 221.3 (200.9, 238.9) (W) and mid-thigh pull 3158 (2690, 3462) and 2035 (1728, 2347) (N). Linear regression analysis shows strong evidence for associations between different anthropometric variables and CrossFit(R) Open performance in men and women, whereas for markers of cardiorespiratory fitness such as V{square}O2peak this was only true for women but not men. Conventional laboratory evaluations of strength, however, manifest minimal evidence for associations with Open performance across both sexes. ConclusionsThis study provides the first detailed insights into the physiology of high-performing CrossFit(R) athletes and informs training optimization. Further the results emphasize the advantage of athletes with shorter limbs and suggests potential modifications to Open workout designs to level the playing field for athletes across different anthropometrics characteristics.

Explore related subjects

physiologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hodzic, D., D'Hulst, G., Leuenberger, R., Arnet, J., Westerhuis, E., Roth, R., Schmidt-Trucksass, A., Knaier, R., Wagner, J.. 2023-10-15. Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.11.561828

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Thoracoabdominal pressure transmission during prone and supine cardiopulmonary resuscitation in fresh-frozen human cadavers

Background: Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be necessary when turning a prone patient supine would delay chest compressions. Although prone compressions can generate arterial pressures comparable with or greater than supine CPR, the pathway of pressure transmission is uncertain. We examined synchronized intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, and central arterial pressures in both supine and prone positions. Methods: Two thawed fresh-frozen adult cadavers underwent three, 2-minute mechanical CPR trials per position in a counterbalanced crossover sequence. Solid-state catheters recorded pleural, peritoneal, and central arterial pressures simultaneously. Trial-level outcomes included peak pressure, mean pressure, pressure-time area, and the mean peritoneal-to-pleural pressure gradient. Exploratory fixed-effects models included position, cadaver, and their interaction. Results: Prone CPR increased peak intrathoracic pressure by 7.04 mmHg, peak intra-abdominal pressure by 21.69 mmHg, and peak arterial pressure by 15.40 mmHg. Mean intra-abdominal and arterial pressures increased by 16.22 and 9.90 mmHg, respectively. The mean peritoneal-to-pleural gradient reversed direction from -8.46 mmHg supine to 4.85 mmHg prone. Intrathoracic pressure-time area increased 3.4-fold, from 1.62 to 5.46 mmHg{middle dot}s, and arterial pressure-time area increased 2.2-fold, from 2.96 to 6.42 mmHg{middle dot}s. Conclusions: Compared to supine, prone mechanical CPR generated higher arterial pressures and reversed the pressure relationship across the thoracoabdominal boundary in both cadavers. Higher abdominal pressure coincided with a larger intrathoracic pressure-time area, a pattern compatible with reduced caudal pressure dissipation.

physiology↗
bioRxiv2026

Hypothalamic Farnesoid X Receptor deficiency alters energy balance by modulating hepatic glucose production and adipose tissue metabolism through central insulin signaling.

Objectives: The bile acid nuclear receptor Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR, NR1H4) is a major regulator of metabolism and energy homeostasis in peripheral organs. It modulates bile acid, glucose, and lipid metabolism, as well as fat mass and body weight. However, FXR is also expressed in the brain, particularly in the hypothalamus, a key center for the regulation of energy homeostasis. Although one study has demonstrated a role for brain FXR activation in energy balance, its specific hypothalamic role is still unknown. Here, we examined the role of FXR in the mediobasal hypothalamus in the regulation of energy balance. Methods: We used a genetic approach combined with metabolic phenotyping to determine the effect of FXR invalidation in the mediobasal hypothalamus on metabolic parameters involved in the central regulation of energy homeostasis. Results: Our results demonstrate that hypothalamic FXR deficiency induces a positive energy balance, resulting in a reduction in energy expenditure due to alterations in glucose metabolism accompanied by structural changes in white adipose tissues. Conclusion: This study uncovers a previously unrecognized role for hypothalamic FXR in the central homeostatic control of energy balance, providing new insights into its contribution to peripheral glucose metabolism and adipose tissue structural remodeling.

physiology↗
bioRxiv2026

Rad and Phospholamban are Key Drivers of the Ventricular Adrenergic Response and Stress-Induced Arrhythmia

The adrenergic response is a fundamental mechanism that regulates heart rate (chronotropy), cardiac contractility (inotropy) and relaxation (lusitropy). Adrenergic stress is also a recognized trigger of arrhythmia in disease. Yet, our understanding of the underlying molecular basis remains incomplete. Protein kinase A (PKA) and the calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) phosphorylate multiple targets proposed to participate in the adrenergic response, including the GTP-binding protein Rad, phospholamban (PLB) and ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2). Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of both Rad and PLB is necessary for inotropy and lusitropy. We show that changes in cardiac contractility and relaxation are primarily dependent on intracellular calcium handling. Finally, we report that Rad and PLB control stress-induced arrhythmogenesis, despite the phosphorylation of other pro-arrhythmic targets. We have identified the essential molecular components of the adrenergic response, resolving a long-standing debate in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling and refining current models of sympathetic regulation in health and disease.

physiology↗