Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.09.22.558821

Dominant CIZ1 fragments drive epigenetic instability and are expressed in early stage cancers

Abstract

CIZ1 is a nuclear matrix protein that is part of the large RNA-dependent supramolecular assembly complexes (SMACs) that form at the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in female cells, and smaller assemblies throughout the nucleus in males and females. It plays a role in maintenance of epigenetic state and gene expression in differentiated cells, via stabilisation of histone post-translational modifications H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3, added by polycomb repressive complexes (PRC) 1 and 2. Here, we show that expression of the N-terminal replication domain (RD) and C-terminal anchor domain (AD) of human CIZ1 transcript is uncoupled, with consistently elevated AD in early stage breast cancers, and sporadically elevated AD in other common solid tumours. At the protein level CIZ1-Xi SMACs are corrupted in female breast cancers cells, and this is accompanied by elevated AD-encoding transcripts. We modelled the effect of AD fragments in primary murine embryonic fibroblasts and observed dominant-negative interference with CIZ1 SMACs during their assembly in early G1 phase. Mutagenesis identified the matrin 3 homology domain as essential for self-interaction to form stable homodimers in vitro, and as a determinant of its dominant-negative effect in cells, implicating the dimerization interface in CIZ1 SMAC integrity. SMAC disruption was coincident with depletion of PRC1-dependent H2AK119ub1 from Xi chromatin, in a manner abrogated by the PR-deubiquitinase inhibitor PR619, suggesting that CIZ1 SMACs normally stabilise H2AK119ub1 by shielding Xi chromatin from attack by deubiquitinases. Moreover, SMAC disruption was accompanied by changes in gene expression within days. Together, the data suggest that inappropriate expression of CIZ1 AD fragments could drive epigenetic instability in early stage breast cancers by destabilizing the CIZ1 SMACs that normally protect repressed chromatin. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=80 SRC="FIGDIR/small/558821v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13b1be2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a3a16corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bac386org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7ac176_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Turvey, G., Lopez de Alba, E., Stewart, E., Byrom, L., Cook, H., Sofi, S., Alati, A., Ainscough, J., Mason, A. S., Antson, A. A., Coverley, D.. 2023-09-22. Dominant CIZ1 fragments drive epigenetic instability and are expressed in early stage cancers. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.22.558821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗