Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.08.09.552691

Differences in the Pupillary Responses to Evening Light between Children and Adolescents

Abstract

PurposeTo assess differences in the pupillary light responses (PLRs) to blue and red evening lights between children and adolescents. MethodsForty healthy participants (8-9 years, n=21; 15-16 years, n=19) completed a PLR assessment 1 h before their habitual bedtime. After a 1 h dim-light adaptation period (<1 lux), baseline pupil diameter was measured in darkness for 30 s, followed by a 10 s exposure to 3.0x1013 photons/cm2/s of either red (627 nm) or blue (459 nm) light, and a 40 s recovery in darkness to assess pupillary re-dilation. Subsequently, participants underwent 7 min of dim-light re-adaptation followed by an exposure to the other light condition. Lights were counterbalanced across participants. ResultsAcross both age groups, maximum pupil constriction was significantly greater (p< 0.001, {eta}p2=0.48) and more sustained (p< 0.001, {eta}p2=0.41) during exposure to blue compared to red light. For adolescents, the post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR), a hallmark of melanopsin function, was larger after blue compared with red light (p= 0.02, d=0.60). This difference was not observed in children. Across light exposures, children had larger phasic (p< 0.01, {eta}p2=0.20) and maximal (p< 0.01, {eta}p2=0.22) pupil constrictions compared to adolescents. ConclusionsBlue light elicited a greater and more sustained pupillary response than red light across participants. However, the overall amplitude of the rod/cone-driven phasic response was greater in children than in adolescents. Our findings using the PLR highlight a higher sensitivity to evening light in children compared to adolescents, and continued maturation of the human non-visual photoreception/system throughout development.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hartstein, L. E., LeBourgeois, M. K., Durniak, M. T., Najjar, R. P.. 2023-08-14. Differences in the Pupillary Responses to Evening Light between Children and Adolescents. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.09.552691

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

28S-rsRNA facilitates PASMC proliferation through PKM2 β-hydroxybutyrylation

Ribosomal RNA-derived small RNAs (rsRNAs) are nucleic acid fragments originating from rRNA, the functions and roles of which in diseases remain incompletely understood. We identified 28S rsRNA-CTC_L20, an rsRNA whose expression is upregulated in hypoxic pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) and in lung tissues of pulmonary hypertension (PH) models. In hypoxic cells, 28S rsRNA-CTC_L20 promotes PASMC proliferation, and its knockdown mitigates SuHx-induced pulmonary hypertension and vascular remodeling. Mechanistically, 28S rsRNA-CTC_L20 modulates {beta}-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) production by maintaining the stability of ketogenic enzyme mRNAs through its "CTGNNGG" motif. Elevated levels of BHB enhance the {beta}-hydroxybutyrylation modification at K166 of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), increasing its activity and driving glycolysis to sustain proliferation. These results link ketone body metabolism to glycolysis in hypoxic cells and define an rsRNA-BHB-PKM2 {beta}-hydroxybutyrylation axis in PH. They also point to 28S rsRNA-CTC_L20 as a potential target for treating vascular remodeling.

physiology↗

Selective activation of estrogen receptors modulates electrical activity and insulin secretion in human EndoC-βH1 cells

Estrogen receptors (ERs), ER and ER{beta} have important roles in the physiology of the endocrine pancreas in animal models, but the effects of ER activation on insulin-secreting human cells are still poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of ER and ER{beta} as modulators of electrical activity and insulin secretion in the insulin-secreting human cell line EndoC-{beta}H1. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed a widespread cellular distribution of ER, while ER{beta} was predominantly localized outside the nucleus. We observed that both estradiol (E2) and the ER{beta} agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN) led to a decrease in insulin secretion in the absence of stimulatory glucose concentrations, without affecting insulin content. Patch-clamp experiments revealed that a 48-hour treatment with either the ER agonist PPT or DPN resulted in depolarization of the resting membrane potential, increased action potential firing frequency, and altered the action potential waveform in EndoC-{beta}H1 cells. PPT increased voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel currents, while DPN reduced K+ and Na+ currents. These results suggest that activation of ER and ER{beta} modulates beta-cell electrical activity through distinct pathways involving ion channels. The effects of E2, PPT, and DPN were not caused by altered expression levels of ion channel genes after 48 hours of treatment. This suggests that these receptors act extranuclearly without affecting gene expression. Together, our findings demonstrate that selective activation of ER and ER{beta} modulates beta-cell excitability through distinct electrophysiological mechanisms and that E2 and DPN reduce basal insulin secretion in human EndoC-{beta}H1 cells. These results support ER and ER{beta} as potential targets for modulating human pancreatic beta-cell function.

physiology↗

Body weight modifies the efficacy of lifespan-extending interventions in ad libitum-fed mice

Geroprotective interventions are often assessed by extension of lifespan in ad libitum-fed mice. Increased lifespan could therefore reflect rescue of adverse phenotypes of unhealthy controls. We analysed body weight and survival for 33,780 mice in the Interventions Testing Program (ITP) to test whether treatment effects varied with body weight. In males, each added standard deviation of attained adult weight made treatment 6% more favourable (HR 0.94), more apparent for interventions that lowered body weight (HR 0.90). Median lifespan increase rose from 6.2% in mice in the lightest quartile to 20.2% in the heaviest pre-dosing weight quartile among those experiments, mainly because control survival declined more steeply with weight than that of the intervention group. The effect of body weight was consistent across 13 of 14 compounds and reflected weight attained during adulthood rather than in early life. Weight-dependence of intervention effects was weak in ITP females, possibly because median survival of controls exceeded that of every sampled non-ITP female control group. Amelioration of weight-associated risk is therefore implicated as a major contributor to lifespan increases relative to heavy, short-lived controls. The geroprotective effects of these interventions may thus be less apparent in metabolically healthier mice or humans.

physiology↗