Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.07.31.551152

Combined, yet Separate: cocktails of carriers (not drugs) for α-particle therapy of solid tumors expressing moderate-to-low levels of targetable markers

Abstract

Alpha-particle radionuclide-antibody conjugates are being clinically evaluated against solid cancers expressing moderate levels of the targeted markers, with promising results. These findings are attributed to the high killing power of alpha-particles in spite of the expected decrease in antibody tumor uptake, that reduces tumor absorbed doses. However, when tumor absorbed doses are reduced, addressing the heterogeneities in delivery of alpha-particles within solid tumors (i.e. enabling uniform irradiation patterns) becomes critical: to maintain efficacy, the fewer alpha-particles delivered within tumors need to traverse/hit as many different cancer cells as possible. This proof-of-concept study describes an approach to complement the antibody- targeted radiotherapy by using a separate carrier to deliver a fraction of the injected radioactivity to tumor regions geographically different than those affected by the antibody; collectively, the two carriers should distribute the alpha-particle emitters, Actinium-225 in particular, more uniformly within tumors maintaining efficacy. MethodsWe monitored the extent(s) of tumor growth inhibition, onset delay of spontaneous metastases and/or survival on orthotopic MDA-MB-213 and MDA-MB-436 triple negative breast cancer mouse models and on an ectopic BxPC3 pancreatic cancer mouse model, treated systemically with the two separate carriers. Tumors were chosen to express different (but low) levels of HER1, utilized as a model antibody-targeted marker. ResultsIndependent of tumor origin and/or resistance to chemotherapy, the two separate carriers: (a) improved the primary tumor growth inhibition, (b) eliminated the formation of spontaneous metastases, and/or (c) prolonged survival, at lower or comparable tumor delivered doses relative to the antibody alone, without noticeable off-target toxicities. ConclusionThis tumor-agnostic strategy is timely and could be used to enhance the efficacy of existing alpha-particle radionuclide-antibody treatments without increasing, possibly even reducing, the total administered radioactivity.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nair, R., Prasad, A., Bhatavdekar, O., Sarkar, A., Gabrielson, K. L., Sofou, S.. 2023-08-02. Combined, yet Separate: cocktails of carriers (not drugs) for α-particle therapy of solid tumors expressing moderate-to-low levels of targetable markers. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.31.551152

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

SpiraMed: A Stereotactic Helix-based Therapy Delivery system for the Human Brain

Stereotactic needle-based delivery remains the standard for local administration of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) to the human brain. ATMP administration typically involves multiple trajectories, presenting cumulative risks and prolonging surgery. Reflux-prone, patchy therapy coverage compromises clinical results. We demonstrate a novel approach, deploying a helical delivery catheter via a single access trajectory per target, referred to as SpiraMed. Helix retraction is synchronised with therapy delivery, enabling comprehensive target coverage in seconds. Helix pitch and diameter can be precisely tailored to patient-specific target volume and vascular anatomy, as part of the preoperative stereotactic surgical planning process. Testing in agarose phantoms, live sheep and cadaveric human brain confirms enhanced therapy delivery volume, delivery speed and target coverage, with reductions in reflux and predicted risk of bleeding complication. SpiraMed represents a new paradigm, promising to help deliver on the transformative potential of cell and gene therapies across the spectrum of human CNS disease.

bioengineering↗

AtomWeaver: Multi-Component Flow Matching with a Structured Geometric Prior Facilitates Non-Canonical Peptide Design

Fixed-backbone sequence discovery, or inverse folding, is a critical recurring task in the development of new polypeptide therapeutics. Once promising backbones are established for a target pocket, computational inverse folding methods greatly help accelerate generation of candidate sequences. Such methods are mature for the traditional case of limiting to the fixed twenty-letter canonical vocabulary; however, they cannot access the broader space of non-canonical amino acids (NCAAs). This design constraint is exacerbated for peptide binders, a fast-growing modality that readily incorporates NCAAs, though in practice non-canonical design frequently depends on laborious medicinal-chemistry campaigns. An extension of inverse folding to NCAAs is thus critical to accelerating design of novel therapeutic peptides. AtomWeaver uses a joint all-site, atom-level generative scheme that does not restrict side-chain categorical assignment by either predetermined or co-resolving residue identity. Conditioned only on a fixed peptide backbone and its target protein, its multi-component flow guides side-chain atoms as unlabeled points in R3 from a nested shell prior to a variable-count final atom cloud. Identity is then read by matching each predicted cloud against a reference library of canonical and non-canonical templates. Since identity is decided only at decode time, the addressable vocabulary is a property of the library rather than of the trained weights: a new NCAA costs one reference structure and no retraining, and the model can select residues it was never prompted for and never saw in training. On a deep mutational scan of two peptide-target systems, AtomWeaver's canonical readout shows high observed mean agreement with experimental values among the compared inverse-folding methods. In the mixed canonical-noncanonical setting that canonical-only baselines cannot support at all, it likewise retains ranking signal across both systems. AtomWeaver also displayed self-consistent designs on de novo binder backbones, with the highest interface confidence among compared methods. Notably, it reached these metrics while achieving broad empirical coverage of our 300-residue vocabulary, including four non-canonical types never visible in training. AtomWeaver thus serves canonical and non-canonical peptide design alike, while transforming residue vocabulary to an expandable inference-time choice.

bioengineering↗

The Influence of Obesity and Body Shape on Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Obstacle Crossing

Altered walking mechanics in individuals with obesity can contribute to knee osteoarthritis. The gait deviations may become more pronounced during obstacle crossing. In women, body fat distribution may further influence knee load, especially when excess fat accumulates in the thighs and hips. However, relatively little is known about how regional fat distribution affects gait in women with obesity. This study investigated how obesity and, among women, different fat distributions (Apple: more abdominal fat; Pear: more lower-limb fat) influence knee biomechanics during walking with and without obstacle crossing. Participants were 15 controls without obesity (NB) and 27 with obesity (OB). Within female participants, 10 without obesity (fNB) were compared with 20 with obesity, stratified by waist-hip ratio (Apple:10, Pear:10). Speed-adjusted statistical parametric mapping applied a general linear model (NB vs. OB) and an analysis of covariance (fNB vs. Apple vs. Pear). OB exhibited a significantly greater late-stance knee extension moment than NB across all tasks, and this difference persisted among fNB, Apple, and Pear in obstacle tasks (p<0.05). OB walked with reduced knee flexion during the early-stance leading limb after crossing a medium-height obstacle (p=0.048) and a high-height obstacle (p=0.008) compared to NB. There were significant body-shape effects (p<0.05), and post-hoc comparisons confirmed that Pear had lower knee angles than fNB in both leading-limb conditions after crossing medium- and high-height obstacles (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). These findings suggest that obstacle crossing helps illuminate how excess weight influences knee biomechanics, and how regional fat distribution modulates the degree of this alteration.

bioengineering↗