Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.07.27.550506

Evolutionary signatures of human cancers revealed via genomic analysis of over 35,000 patients

Abstract

By leveraging the ever-increasing availability of cancer omics data and the continuous advances in cancer data science and machine learning, we have discovered the existence of cancer type-specific evolutionary signatures associated with different disease outcomes. These signatures represent "favored trajectories" of acquisition of driver mutations that are repeatedly detected in patients with similar prognosis. In this work, we present a novel framework named ASCETIC (Agony-baSed Cancer EvoluTion InferenCe) that extracts such signatures from NGS experiments generated by different technologies such as bulk and single-cell sequencing data. In our study, we applied ASCETIC to (i) single-cell sequencing data from 146 patients with distinct myeloid malignancies and bulk whole-exome sequencing data from 366 acute myeloid leukemia patients, (ii) multi-region sequencing data from 100 early-stage lung cancer patients from the TRACERx project, (iii) whole-exome/genome sequencing data from more than 10,000 Pan-Cancer Atlas samples, and (iv) targeted bulk sequencing data from more than 25,000 MSK-MET metastatic patients (both datasets including multiple cancer types). As a result, we extracted different cancer (sub)type-specific single-nucleotide variants evolutionary signatures associated with clusters of patients with statistically significant different prognoses. In addition, we conducted several validations using diverse and previously unexplored datasets to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the evolutionary signatures extracted by ASCETIC. Such analyses provided evidence of the robustness and generalizability of the identified evolutionary patterns.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fontana, D., Crespiatico, I., Crippa, V., Malighetti, F., Villa, M., Angaroni, F., De Sano, L., Aroldi, A., Antoniotti, M., Caravagna, G., Piazza, R., Graudenzi, A., Mologni, L., Ramazzotti, D.. 2023-07-30. Evolutionary signatures of human cancers revealed via genomic analysis of over 35,000 patients. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.27.550506

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Generation of a transgenic cephalopod

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are marine mollusks with elaborate nervous systems that support a diverse repertoire of complex behaviors. These include the neural control of the color, pattern, and texture of the skin, facilitating both adaptive camouflage and innate patterning that may reflect internal state. The development of transgenic cephalopods expressing fluorescent proteins, optogenetic actuators, and reporters of neural activity would contribute a new and important technology to cephalopod biology. The generation of transgenic cephalopods, however, has remained a major challenge. Here, we report the development of stable transgenic dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) expressing ubiquitous nuclear-localized mScarlet, a red fluorescent protein. We evaluated multiple strategies for transgenesis, and established cuttlefish lines using both CRISPR and the transposons Sleeping Beauty and Minos. The stable expression of transgenes enabled live imaging of cell dynamics during embryonic development. The Minos transposon emerged as the most efficient transgenesis strategy and is adaptable to promoters and transgenes of choice. These strategies now enable the generation of diverse genetic tools for mechanistic studies of cephalopod biology.

genetics↗

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗