Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.07.24.550391

How does fertilization impact the wild blueberry microbiome

Abstract

Wild blueberries production is regarded as less intensive than other agricultural systems, although several agricultural practices are commonly implemented to increase crop yields and to mitigate pets and pathogen attacks. Fertilization, organic or mineral, is used to increase soil nutrient availability and improve fruit yield. Wild blueberry plants are also known to depend on their microbiome to overcome the lack of nutrient availability in the soil and their symbiosis with ericoid mycorrhizal fungi is thought to be crucial in that regard. As fertilization can alter crop microbial communities, our study aimed to measure the impact of this practice in a wild blueberry setting, focusing on the bacterial and fungal communities found in the roots and rhizosphere of Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., both at the time of application and more than year later during the harvest season. Our study indicates that fertilization, whether mineral or organic, has a minimal effect on microbial communities. One year after application, fertilization does not seem to have a negative repercussion on the ericoid mycorrhizal (ErM) fungal community as no significant differences were observed in terms of relative abundance on known and putative ErM taxa between the control and the two fertilizer treatments. The fact that fertilization is applied at a low rate could explain this absence of effect on the microbial communities. However, longer-term studies are needed to ensure that repeated fertilization does not cause any shifts in microbial communities that could be detrimental to the wild blueberry nutrition. ImportanceThis study examines the impact of fertilization, whether organic or mineral, on microbial communities in the roots and rhizosphere of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). both Fertilization is commonly used to enhance soil nutrient availability and improve fruit yield, but its effects on the plants microbiome, particularly on the ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErM), are not well understood. The samples were taken both during the pruning season, 3 months after the treatment, and one year later, during harvest season. The results suggest that fertilization has minimal impact on the microbial communities. One year after application, no significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of known and putative ErM taxa between the control group and the two fertilizer-treated groups. The low amount of fertilization applied could explain these results. However, longer-term research are needed to ensure that repeated fertilization does not lead to detrimental shifts in microbial communities affecting wild blueberry nutrition.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Morvan, S., Pare, M. C., Lafond, J., Hijri, M.. 2023-07-26. How does fertilization impact the wild blueberry microbiome. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.550391

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

pTRIP, a novel integration plasmid for Listeria monocytogenes

In the past decades, several tools to genetically modify the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes were developed. Here, we constructed a new integrative plasmid system for L. monocytogenes named pTRIP, for treB insertion plasmid. pTRIP is a vector which stably integrates into the treB locus of the wild type EGD-e. This locus encodes the sole trehalose-specific EIIB and EIIC component of a phosphotransferase system. Successful integration leads to the disruption of treB and thus, to an inability of the resulting L. monocytogenes strains to grow on trehalose as sole carbon source. Due to integration through double homologous recombination, it is the first integrative system which does not require antibiotic selection pressure. To assess functionality of the pTRIP system, prfA and its native promoter region were integrated into the treB locus of a {Delta}prfA strain. Complementation was confirmed in 78% of the isolated clones, indicating successful integration of prfA into the treB locus. We further constructed derivatives of pTRIP harboring the constitutive Pp60 (pTRIP1) and the inducible Prha (pTRIP2) promoter to further expand application possibilities. Microscopic analyses confirmed the functionality of both promoter constructs and showed dose-dependent induction for Prha. pTRIP is an efficient tool for stable gene expression as well as functional studies and expands genetic modification possibilities for L. monocytogenes.

microbiology↗

A rational design strategy and validation for protease-resistant fusion-inhibitor antiviral peptides

Peptide-based fusion inhibitors are promising pharmaceuticals in the fight against enveloped viruses relying on membrane fusion for host infection. However, peptide therapeutic applications have long been hindered by their poor stability in vivo. Here, we discovered that peptide inhibitors with the wildtype sequence of the heptad repeat 2 (HR2) domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are efficiently cleaved by Transmembrane Protease, Serine 2 (TMPRSS2), a key protease involved in the SARS-CoV-2 virus-cell fusion pathway. We then identified the corresponding cleavage sites and designed three protease-resistant peptides using ranking based on deep mutational scanning and natural occurrence. The three candidates all exhibit inhibitory activity in a cell-cell fusion assay. A high-resolution cryo-EM structure of the top candidate, HR2-NHN, bound to its HR1 target reveals the molecular basis for its potent activity. The top candidate of the cell-based screening assay significantly improved efficacy relative to the wildtype peptide when administered 12 h before infection in both an authentic virus-cell infection assay and a mouse assay. More broadly, our results suggest that the design strategies for protease-resistant peptides could be applied to a broad spectrum of other enveloped viruses and pave the way for the development of safe, prophylactic antivirals that can be administered before exposure.

microbiology↗

Host soluble inositol phosphate signaling promotes coronavirus replication

Coronaviruses rely extensively on host pathways for replication, making host-directed therapies an attractive strategy for broad-spectrum antivirals with reduced risk of viral resistance. Here we identify the host soluble inositol phosphate pathway as a previously unrecognized dependency for coronavirus infection. Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of several kinases in this pathway markedly suppresses replication of both alpha- and betacoronaviruses, while increasing pathway activity promotes viral replication. We developed UNC7844, a potent multi-target inhibitor of these kinases, which reduces coronavirus replication by more than four orders of magnitude in cultured cells and suppresses coronavirus infection in mice. Mechanistically, UNC7844 suppresses inositol (pyro)phosphates production, disrupts phosphoinositide homeostasis, and impairs late endosomal dynamics, blocking early post-entry steps required for viral genome release and replication. Together, our findings establish the soluble inositol (pyro)phosphate pathway as an important regulator of coronavirus infection and highlight its inhibition as a promising host-directed antiviral strategy.

microbiology↗