Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.07.18.549617

Assessment of the bound conformation of Bombesin to the BB1 and BB2 Receptors

Perez, J. J.·Vila-Julia, G.·Rubio-Martinez, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Bombesin is an endogenous peptide involved in a wide spectrum of physiological activities ranging from satiety, control of circadian rhythm and thermoregulation in the central nervous system, to stimulation of gastrointestinal hormone release, activation of macrophages and effects on development in peripheral tissues. Actions of the peptide are mediated through the two high affinity G-protein coupled receptors BB1 and BB2. Under pathophysiological conditions, these receptors are overexpressed in many different types of tumors, such as prostate cancer, breast cancer, small and non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. This knowledge has been used for designing cell markers, but it has not been yet exploited for therapeutical purposes. Despite the enormous biological interest of the peptide, little is known about the stereochemical features that contribute to their activity. On the one hand, mutagenesis studies identified a few receptor residues important for high bombesin affinity and on the other, a few studies focused on the relevance of diverse residues of the peptide for receptor activation. Models of the peptide bound to BB1 and BB2 can be helpful to improve our understanding of the stereochemical features granting bombesin activity. Accordingly, the present study describes the computational process followed to construct such models from models of the peptide and its receptors by means of Steered Molecular Dynamics. Present results provide new insights into the structure-activity relationships of bombesin and its receptors, as well as render an explanation for the differential binding affinity observed towards the BB1 and BB2 receptors. Finally, these models can be further exploited to help for designing novel small molecule peptidomimetics with improved pharmacokinetics profile. AUTHOR SUMMARYThe goal of the present work is to construct models of bombesin bound to its receptors BB1 and BB2. The work represents an attempt to conceal experimental information available for bombesin activity on key residues of the sequence, as well as on specific residues in the receptors derived from site-directed mutagenesis with its structure. For this purpose, models of the two receptors were constructed homology using endothelin B as template and a model of bombesin structure in solution. Next, bombesin was docked onto each of the two receptors by means of Steered Molecular Dynamics, by pulling the peptide into the receptor using a constant force. Ten trials were performed on each receptor. After each trial, the resulting complex was relaxed using a 200 ns MD trajectory. In addition, the binding free energy was computed by means of the MMPBSA method for each of these simulations. Next, residue contributions to the binding free energy permitted to select the most suitable complex by comparison of their contributions to their importance deduced from experimental results. The best-fitted complex for each receptor was subject of a 2 s MD simulation that permitted to compute a difference of the binding free energy of the peptide that agrees well with pharmacology data. Finally, a study of the binding free energy contributions per residue permitted to understand specific differences between the bound conformation of bombesin in two receptors that explain the observed differential affinity. Specifically, a non-conserved residue in ECL3 (Pro in BB1 and Thr in BB2) appears to be responsible of a differential interaction of Arg(6.58) with the peptide, in addition to provide an extra interaction with Gln7 of bombesin (in the case of Thr(ECL3)). These models permit to explain the differential pharmacological profile, despite the high sequence identity between the two receptors, shedding light into the structure-activity relationships of the peptide available.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

biophysicsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Perez, J. J., Vila-Julia, G., Rubio-Martinez, J.. 2023-07-19. Assessment of the bound conformation of Bombesin to the BB1 and BB2 Receptors. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549617

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Mechanism of molecular recognition revealed through dynamic drug binding pathways to SARS-CoV-2 main protease

Characterization of drug-binding pathways remains experimentally limited by transient intermediates and computationally challenging due to long timescales intractable for conventional molecular dynamics. To address these challenges, we combined solution NMR titrations with weighted ensemble (WE) enhanced sampling simulations to resolve atomistic pathways of nirmatrelvir binding to the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. NMR titration revealed residue-dependent heterogeneity spanning fast, intermediate, and slow exchange regimes. WE simulations complement the NMR by providing insights into unassigned residues and adding time-resolved and three-dimensional structural context. We map key interactions along two distinct binding pathways, provide dynamic explanations for residues involved in resistance, and capture unique backbone conformations compared to those sampled in unbound or bound states. Our comprehensive binding model is consistent with a combined conformational selection and induced fit mechanism in which early transient contacts are made with residues E47 and L50 and allosteric motions are centered around residue V204 of the distal domain. This synergistic application of WE and titration NMR enables a more comprehensive characterization of drug binding than either method alone, providing an integrated framework that may have broader applicability to defining structure-kinetic relationships and guiding design of next-generation inhibitors.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

Discriminating betacoronavirus receptor usage across subgenera using protein structure prediction and molecular dynamics

A critical step in the emergence of a virus is the ability of the viral protein to bind a host receptor and mediate cell entry. For many coronaviruses, this interaction occurs between the Spike S1 subunit and the human ACE2 receptor. Whether this binding interface can be computationally distinguished across unstudied viruses without experimentally resolved protein structures remains an open question. We predicted how 28 emerging coronaviruses may bind to human ACE2 using structural predictions, static interaction prediction programs, and molecular dynamics simulations. To screen the emerging coronaviruses, we predicted a library of S1 structures using AlphaFold. These predicted structures were then used to model the S1-ACE2 interaction with AlphaFold, ClusPro, and HADDOCK. We used known ACE2-binding sarbecoviruses as positive controls and coronaviruses that bind other receptors as negative controls to threshold predicted binding. Contact analysis quantified the predicted binding and revealed that these static interaction prediction methods varied in discriminative power. Less restrained static predictions separated binders from non-binders, whereas heavily restrained docking did not, potentially forcing an interaction where none should exist. This analysis highlighted an emerging coronavirus, Zhejiang2013, as a potential ACE2 binder. We used molecular dynamics simulations to further assess the static predictions and model the interaction over time. Overall, our results indicate that Zhejiang2013 exhibits dynamic interaction patterns consistent with ACE2 binding. Given that two ACE2-binding coronaviruses have caused global pandemics within the past two decades, identifying potential ACE2 binders is critical for early warning and pandemic preparedness.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

De novo design of flexible protein interactions with GuideFlip

De novo design of protein binders requires a target structure. However, for flexible targets, such as intrinsically disordered proteins, this structure does not exist until the binder has stabilized the interaction. Such targets are therefore difficult for methods that separate structure generation from sequence design. We introduce GuideFlip, which co-designs structure and sequence through guided discrete flow matching: binder residues are assigned progressively while the complex is re-predicted at each step, allowing the evolving interface to affect the design process. GuideFlip reduces the hydrophobic bias of direct AlphaFold optimization and improves in silico success rates over existing approaches. We release a database of binder candidates for 177 human disordered proteins. Experimentally, we obtain de novo binders to the C-terminus of -synuclein and the disordered amino terminus of RBX1 with hit rates of 13.5% and 41.7%, respectively, and we confirm the epitopes of selected binders by NMR and mutagenesis. Applying GuideFlip to flexibility on the binder side, we design a nanobody that binds the agonist-bound {beta}1-adrenergic receptor in the active state, but not the receptor in its inactive state, with a 75% hit rate and cryo-EM structure confirming the design. GuideFlip enables protein design where bound structures emerge only upon binding.

biophysics↗