Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.07.07.548175

Mitochondrial-Derived Compartments Remove Surplus Proteins from the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane

Abstract

The outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) creates a boundary that imports most of the mitochondrial proteome while removing extraneous or damaged proteins. How the OMM senses aberrant proteins and remodels to maintain OMM integrity remains unresolved. Previously, we identified a piecemeal autophagic mechanism called the mitochondrial-derived compartment (MDC) that removes a subset of the mitochondrial proteome. Here we show that MDCs specifically sequester proteins localized only at the OMM, providing an explanation for how select mitochondrial proteins are removed by MDCs. Remarkably, selective sorting into MDCs also occurs within the OMM, as subunits of the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) complex are excluded from MDCs unless assembly of the TOM complex is impaired. Considering that overloading the OMM with mitochondrial membrane proteins or mistargeted tail-anchored membrane proteins induces MDCs to form and sequester these proteins, we propose that one functional role of MDCs is to create an OMM-enriched trap that segregates and sequesters excess proteins from the mitochondrial surface. SUMMARYWilson and colleagues observe that mitochondrial-derived compartments (MDCs) selectively incorporate proteins from only the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), and robustly sequester both excess and mistargeted proteins into this OMM-enriched domain, suggesting MDCs act to remove surplus hydrophobic cargo from mitochondria.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wilson, Z. N., Balasubramaniam, S. S., Wopat, M., Hughes, A.. 2023-07-08. Mitochondrial-Derived Compartments Remove Surplus Proteins from the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.07.548175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗

Tracking the conformational dynamics of single molecules in live cells; GTPase cycling in Cdc42 gradients and microclusters

The Rho family of GTPases play a critical role in many cellular processes by acting as molecular switches relying on conformational changes to transition between active and inactive states. The spatial distribution and kinetics of these conformational changes are complex and vary across the cell. We describe here biosensors based on environment-responsive fluorescent dyes, capable of reporting the conformational changes of individual GTPase molecules as they traffic within living cells (SPARC Cdc42 and SPARC Rac1, 'Single Particle Activation Reporter Constructs'). We use SPARC Cdc42 to determine the rates of different steps in GTPase regulation, activation/inactivation and membrane insertion, that together generate localized gradients of Cdc42 activity driving cell motility. The biosensors also revealed heterogeneously distributed clusters of Cdc42, the mechanisms of their activation, and potential roles in polarized motility.

cell biology↗

High-content screening identifies FDA-approved activators of mitophagy

Mitochondrial diseases are highly heterogeneous disorders caused by defects in oxidative phosphorylation, for which only limited therapeutic options are available. The elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria via mitophagy activation is an attractive strategy to treat several mitochondrial diseases, irrespective of the underlying genetic defect. To identify pharmacological activators of this pathway, we performed a high-content screening of 1,971 FDA-approved compounds using cellular reporters of TFEB nuclear translocation and mitophagy. This screening identified 294 compounds that promoted TFEB translocation, nine of which increased the number of mitolysosomes without compromising cell viability or damaging mitochondria. Among the selected compounds, Meptazinol and Ponatinib emerged as the top-ranked mitophagy inducers in fibroblasts from patients with complex I and IV deficiency, respectively, and were prioritised for further characterisation. However, they did not rescue the bioenergetic defect, suggesting that the stimulation of mitophagy per se is not sufficient to ameliorate the OXPHOS defect in mitochondrial diseases. Overall, our findings establish a scalable platform for the identification of pharmacological activators of TFEB and identify candidate compounds for therapeutic modulation of mitophagy.

cell biology↗