Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.06.08.544285

Unifying sparse coding, predictive coding, and divisive normalization

Abstract

Sparse coding, predictive coding and divisive normalization have each been found to be principles that underlie the function of neural circuits in many parts of the brain, supported by substantial experimental evidence. However, the connections between these related principles are still poorly understood. Sparse coding and predictive coding can be reconciled into a learning framework with predictive structure and sparse responses, termed as sparse/predictive coding. However, how sparse/predictive coding (a learning model) is connected with divisive normalization (not a learning model) is still not well investigated. In this paper, we show how sparse coding, predictive coding, and divisive normalization can be described within a unified framework, and illustrate this explicitly within the context of a two-layer neural learning model of sparse/predictive coding. This two-layer model is constructed in a way that implements sparse coding with a network structure that is constructed by implementing predictive coding. We demonstrate how a homeostatic function that regulates neural responses in the model can shape the nonlinearity of neural responses in a way that replicates different forms of divisive normalization. Simulations show that the model can learn simple cells in the primary visual cortex with the property of contrast saturation, which has previously been explained by divisive normalization. In summary, the study demonstrates that the three principles of sparse coding, predictive coding, and divisive normalization can be connected to provide a learning framework based on biophysical properties, such as Hebbian learning and homeostasis, and this framework incorporates both learning and more diverse response nonlinearities observed experimentally. This framework has the potential to also be used to explain how the brain learns to integrate input from different sensory modalities. Author SummaryComputational principles are often proposed to reveal the neural computations underlying brain functions. In the past three decades, sparse coding, predictive coding and divisive normalization have been three influential computational principles that have much success in different areas of neuroscience. Sparse coding offers insights into how the brain learns meaningful associations based on the hypothesis of brain being very efficient. With an emphasis on prediction, predictive coding provides an appealing hierarchical framework of only sending prediction errors to higher layers. Divisive normalization is a mathematical equation designed to account for the extensive nonlinearities in the brain. All these three computational principles along their variants have greatly improved our understanding of the underlying mechanism of the brain. Though connection between sparse and predictive coding has been studied previously, how sparse/predictive coding is connected to a seemingly different principle, divisive normalization, to provide a unified understanding of the brain is still unclear. In this paper, we show that sparse coding, predictive coding and divisive normalization can be connected from first principles. We propose a learning framework that is based on the hypothesis of efficiency, implemented with a predictive structure and displays response nonlinearities of divisive normalization. This framework can be potentially examined and used in a broader context such as multi-sensory integration.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lian, Y., Burkitt, A. N.. 2023-06-09. Unifying sparse coding, predictive coding, and divisive normalization. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.08.544285

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗