Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.04.25.538234

Direction-dependent neural control of finger dexterity in humans

Abstract

Humans, more than all other species, skillfully flex and extend their fingers to perform delicate motor tasks. This unique dexterous ability is a product of the complex anatomical properties of the human hand and the neural mechanisms that control it. Yet, the neural basis that underlies human dexterous hand movement remains unclear. Here we characterized individuation (fine control) and strength (gross control) during flexion and extension finger movements, isolated the peripheral passive mechanical coupling component from the central neuromuscular activity involved in dexterity and then applied voxel-based lesion mapping in first-event sub-acute stroke patients to investigate the causal link between the neural substrates and the behavioral aspects of finger dexterity. We found substantial differences in dexterous behavior, favoring finger flexion over extension. These differences were not caused by peripheral factors but were rather driven by central origins. Lesion-symptom mapping identified a critical brain region for finger individuation within the primary sensory-motor cortex (M1, S1), the premotor cortex (PMC), and the corticospinal (CST) fibers that descend from them. Although there was a great deal of overlap between individuated flexion and extension, we were able to identify distinct areas within this region that were associated exclusively with finger flexion. This flexion-biased differential premotor and motor cortical organization was associated with the finger individuation component, but not with finger strength. Conversely, lesion mapping revealed slight extension-biases in finger strength within descending tracts of M1. From these results we propose a model that summarizes the distinctions between individuation and strength and between finger movement in flexion and extension, revealed in human manual dexterity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rajchert, O., Ofir-Geva, S., Melul, Y., Khoury-Mireb, M., Wonderman Bar-Sela, O., Granot, O., Caspi, T., Frenkel-Toledo, S., Soroker, N., Mawase, F.. 2023-04-25. Direction-dependent neural control of finger dexterity in humans. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.25.538234

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗