Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.03.24.534160

Predicting phenotype to mechanotype relationships in cells based on intra-cellular signaling network

Abstract

Cells originating from the same tissue can respond differently to external signals depending on the genotypic and phenotypic state of the cell and its local environment. We have developed a semi-quantitative-computational model to analyze the intracellular signaling network and its outcome in the presence of multiple external signals including growth factors, hormones, and extracellular matrix. We use this model to analyze the cells mechanical response to external stimuli and identify the key internal elements of the network that drive specific outcomes within the response space. The model is built upon the Boolean approach to network modeling, where the state of any given node is determined using the state of the connecting nodes and Boolean logic. This allows us to analyze the network behavior without the need to estimate all the various interaction rates between different cellular components. However, such an approach is limited in its ability to predict network dynamics and temporal evolution of the cell state. So, we introduce modularity in the model and incorporate dynamical aspects, mass-action kinetics, and chemo-mechanical effects on only certain transition rates within specific modules as required, creating a Boolean-Hybrid-Modular (BoHyM) signal transduction model. We present this model as a comprehensive, cell-type agnostic, user-modifiable tool to investigate how extra-and intra-cellular signaling can regulate cellular cytoskeletal components and consequently influence cell-substrate interactions, force generation, and migration. Using this tool, we show how slight changes in signaling network architectures due to phenotypic changes can alter cellular response to stress hormone signaling in an environment-dependent manner. The tool also allows isolating effector proteins driving specific cellular mechanical responses. Ultimately, we show the utility of the tool in analyzing transient chemo-mechanical dynamics of cells in response to time-varying chemical stimuli.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karabay, E. T., Turnlund, A., Grear, J., Fraley, S. I., Katira, P.. 2023-03-27. Predicting phenotype to mechanotype relationships in cells based on intra-cellular signaling network. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.24.534160

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗

Choice of annotation data significantly impacts automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

Genome-scale metabolic models are valuable tools for studying metabolism in many applications, such as metabolic engineering or understanding human disease. However, curated models are available for only a limited number of organisms, and generating high-quality models for additional organisms remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, several software tools have been developed that can produce draft models in an automated fashion, but the quality of these draft models lags behind manually curated ones. Thus, there is still a need to improve these tools. Previous work has focused primarily on developing better methods for each step in the reconstruction process, such as gene annotation and gap-filling. Here, we focus on the data that underlies these methods, such as known connections between protein sequence and function. We find that changing the source of reconstruction data has a substantial impact on the contents and predictions of generated models. In fact, the source of data can have a bigger impact than the choice of reconstruction method. Additionally, we show that the reconstruction process is sensitive to the accuracy of gene annotations in the reconstruction data. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of having functional annotation data from an organism that is closely related to the one for which a model is being built. These observations highlight the importance of reconstruction data and identify principles that should be considered when selecting data for reconstruction tools.

systems biology↗