Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.02.14.519204

Neural Systems Underlying the Implementation of Working Memory Removal Operations

Abstract

Recently multi-voxel pattern analysis has verified the removal of information from working memory (WM) via three distinct operations replacement, suppression, or clearing compared to information being maintained (Kim et al., 2020). Univariate analyses and classifier importance maps indicate that some brain regions commonly contribute to these operations. This study aimed to use multivariate approaches to determine whether, within these commonly activated brain regions, each of these operations is being represented in a similar or distinct manner. To do so, we used Leiden community detection to identify brain networks that are characterized by similar multi-voxel patterns of activity with regard to these WM operations. Four networks were identified. The Visual Network shows similar multi-voxel patterns for maintain and replace, which are highly dissimilar from suppress and clear, suggesting this network differentiates whether an item is held in WM or not. The Somatomotor Network shows distinct multi-voxel patterns for clear relative to the other operations, suggesting that this network diff in clearing information from WM. The Default Mode Network has distinct patterns for suppress and clear, also suggesting that clearing information from WM is distinct from suppressing it. The Frontoparietal Control Network displays distinct multi-voxel patterns for each of the four operations, suggesting that this network has high involvement in regulating the flow of information within WM. These results indicate that how information is removed from WM depends on distinct brain networks that each have a particular manner in which their co-activation patterns represent these operations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe ability to actively remove, manipulate and maintain information in working memory (WM) is required for encoding of new information and for controlling thoughts. This study revealed that different brain networks show characteristic multi-voxel activity patterns across four distinct WM operations: maintenance of information, replacement of one item by another, suppression of a specific item, and clearing the mind of all thought. One network, the Frontoparietal Control Network, differentiates all four operations, suggesting it may play a critical role in the controlled removal of information from WM.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

DeRosa, J., Kim, H., Lewis-Peacock, J., Banich, M.. 2023-02-15. Neural Systems Underlying the Implementation of Working Memory Removal Operations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.14.519204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗