Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.02.03.526992

eXclusionarY: Ten years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWAS?

Abstract

Ten years ago, a detailed analysis of genome-wide association studies showed that only 33% of the studies included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat eXclusion. Here we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine if these earlier recommendations had been translated. Unfortunately, among the summary statistics reported in 2021 in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog, only 25% provided results for the X chromosome and 3% for the Y chromosome, suggesting that the eXclusion phenomenon documented earlier not only persists but has also expanded into an eXclusionarY problem. Normalizing by physical length of the chromosome, the average number of studies published until 11/29/22 with genome-wide significant findings on the X chromosome is ~1 study/Mb. In contrast, it ranges from ~6 to ~16 studies/Mb for chromosomes 4 and 19, respectively. Compared with the autosomal growth rate of ~0.086 studies/Mb/year over the last decade, studies of the X chromosome grew at less than one-seventh that rate, only ~0.012 studies/Mb/year. Among the studies that reported significant association on the X chromosome, there were extreme heterogeneities in how they analyzed the data and documented the results, suggesting the need for guidelines. Not surprisingly, among the 430 scores sampled from the PolyGenic Score catalog, 0% contained weights for sex chromosomal SNPs. To overcome the dearth of sex chromosome analyses, we provide five sets of recommendations and future directions. Finally, until the sex chromosomes are included in a whole-genome study, instead of GWAS, we propose they be more properly referred to as "AWAS" for "autosome-wide scan".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sun, L., Wang, Z., Lu, T., Manolio, T. A., Paterson, A. D.. 2023-02-04. eXclusionarY: Ten years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWAS?. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.526992

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Generation of a transgenic cephalopod

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are marine mollusks with elaborate nervous systems that support a diverse repertoire of complex behaviors. These include the neural control of the color, pattern, and texture of the skin, facilitating both adaptive camouflage and innate patterning that may reflect internal state. The development of transgenic cephalopods expressing fluorescent proteins, optogenetic actuators, and reporters of neural activity would contribute a new and important technology to cephalopod biology. The generation of transgenic cephalopods, however, has remained a major challenge. Here, we report the development of stable transgenic dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) expressing ubiquitous nuclear-localized mScarlet, a red fluorescent protein. We evaluated multiple strategies for transgenesis, and established cuttlefish lines using both CRISPR and the transposons Sleeping Beauty and Minos. The stable expression of transgenes enabled live imaging of cell dynamics during embryonic development. The Minos transposon emerged as the most efficient transgenesis strategy and is adaptable to promoters and transgenes of choice. These strategies now enable the generation of diverse genetic tools for mechanistic studies of cephalopod biology.

genetics↗

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗