Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.01.25.525567

Gigantic Macroraptorial Sperm Whale Tooth (cf. Livyatan) from the Miocene of Orange County, California

Abstract

A fossil tooth from the middle-upper Miocene Monterey or Capistrano Formation in the Orange County Cooper Center Paleontology Collection shows that a gargantuan sperm whale once inhabited the Miocene seas of southern California. Though difficult to diagnose to genus level based on a single, incomplete tooth, comparisons with known Miocene physeteroid whales provide key insight into the affinities of this fossil. Even though the tip is broken, the entire tooth is over 250 mm long and 86 mm in diameter. It has enamel only on the tip of the broken crown and there is no enamel coating over the rest of the tooth. Instead, the tooth consists mostly of layers of cementum over a core of ossified dentin. It is slightly smaller than the largest teeth of the largest known physeteroid, the South American Miocene Livyatan melvillei, a genus that has not been found outside of the Southern Hemisphere besides one record from northern Europe. It is also just slightly smaller than similar gigantic teeth reported from South Africa and Australia from the middle-late Miocene through the early Pliocene. We compared it to other Miocene members of the family such as Hoplocetus, Scaldicetus, and Zygophyseter, but none have teeth as large as this one. It is bigger than all known specimens of all other North American Miocene physeteroid whales, including another whale from the Monterey Formation, Albicetus oxymycterus. This fossil suggests that giant physeteroid whales closely related to Livyatan lived in the North Pacific. It represents a substantial geographic range extension for giant physeteroid whales, previously known only from the Miocene of the Southern Hemisphere and northern Europe.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Watmore, K. I., Prothero, D. R.. 2023-01-26. Gigantic Macroraptorial Sperm Whale Tooth (cf. Livyatan) from the Miocene of Orange County, California. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.25.525567

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Constraining Palaeogeography and Palaeotides for the Cambrian using cnidarian medusae

The ocean tides influence key Earth system processes at a range of spatial and temporal scales. It is known that the geometry of ocean basins is the leading controller of tidal energetics, so well-constrained palaeogeographic reconstructions and tidal properties for Earths past are imperative when investigating other Earth system processes. Here, we present a novel way to constrain both deep-time tidal model results and reconstructions, by combining palaeoecology with sedimentology. We compare new palaeo-tidal model simulations for the Cambrian period, significant for the early origin and radiation of major animal fauna, to tidal proxies. One of the most abundant soft-bodied organisms preserved during this time are cnidarian medusae (jellyfish). A total of 17 cnidarian medusae localities were obtained through the literature, which had an adequate global distribution and occurred at regular intervals throughout the period of study. In some locations there were also estimates of palaeo-tidal range. Our results show a good agreement between the simulations and proxy data. In the few locations where there is disagreement, it is proposed that the palaeogeographic reconstructions are missing details, e.g., island chains, and our results allow for the palaeogeographic reconstructions to be improved. The proxy method presented is promising and can be applied to other time-periods with different marine fossils, particularly at evolutionary and extinction periods where the marginal marine environment is of importance.

paleontology↗

Introducing Isotopia: a stable isotope database for Classical Antiquity

We present Isotopia, an open-access database compiling over 36,000 stable isotope measurements ({delta}13C, {delta}15N, {delta}18O, {delta}34S, 87Sr/86Sr, 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, 208Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/206Pb, and 208Pb/206Pb) on human, animal, and plant bioarchaeological remains dating to Classical Antiquity (approximately 800 BCE - 500 CE). These were recovered from different European regions, particularly from the Mediterranean. Isotopia provides a comprehensive characterisation of the isotopic data, encompassing various historical, archaeological, biological, and environmental variables. Isotopia is a resource for meta-analytical research of past human activities and paleoenvironments. The database highlights data gaps in isotopic classical archaeology, such as the limited number of isotopic measurements available for plants and animals, limited number of studies on spatial mobility, and spatial heterogeneity of isotopic research. As such, we emphasise the necessity to address and fill these gaps in order to unlock the reuse potential of this database.

paleontology↗

Low-invasive sampling method for taxonomic for the identification of archaeological and paleontological bones by proteomics of their collagens

Collagen from paleontological bones is an important organic material for isotopic measurement, radiocarbon and paleoproteomic analyzes, to provide information on diet, dating and taxonomy. Current paleoproteomics methods are destructive and require from a few milligrams to several tenths of milligrams of bone for analysis. In many cultures, bones are raw materials for artefact which are conserved in museum which hampers to damage these precious objects during sampling. Here, we describe a low-invasive sampling method that identifies collagen, taxonomy and post-translational modifications from Holocene and Upper Pleistocene bones dated to 130,000 and 150 BC using dermatological skin tape-discs for sampling. The sampled bone micro-powders were digested following our highly optimized eFASP protocol, then analyzed by MALDI FTICR MS and LC-MS/MS for identifying the genus taxa of the bones. We show that this low-invasive sampling does not deteriorate the bones and achieves results similar to those obtained by more destructive sampling. Moreover, this sampling method can be performed at archaeological sites or in museums.

paleontology↗