Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.12.12.520015

Trilobite moulting behaviour variability had little association with morphometry

Abstract

Trilobite moult assemblages preserved in the fossil record show high variability in moulting behaviour and their resulting moult configurations. The reasons for this variability, and the impacts it might have had on their evolutionary trajectories, are unknown and have rarely been investigated quantitatively. A large dataset of trilobite moult morphometric measurements is presented and statistically analysed for associations between moulting behaviour and morphometry. Results indicate little significant statistical association between the two; only between moulting behaviour (usually generalised moult configuration) and the variances and means of thoracic tergite number, thorax length, and pygidium width. Anterior cranidium width, cranidium length, cephalothoracic joint width, thorax width, pygidium length, and total body length all have non-significant associations with moulting behaviour. Moult specimens showing inversion of the librigenae generally have more thoracic tergites, a correspondingly longer thorax, and a narrower pygidium. Thoracic tergite count and pygidium measurements may have multimodal distributions. Principal Components Analyses and Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling analyses suggest minor differences in the extent of morphometric variation for specimens showing different moulting behaviours, but little difference in the region of morphospace they occupy. This may indicate that trilobite species using Salters mode of moulting had more constrained morphologies, potentially related to facial suture fusion in some groups. Overall, these results do not suggest a strong association between moulting behaviour variation and morphometry in trilobites, leaving open for further study the mystery of why trilobites were so variable in their moulting, and whether this contributed to their long evolutionary reign or ultimate extinction. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYTrilobites were an important and globally abundant group of arthropods (animals with an exoskeleton and jointed limbs) that lived ~521-251 million years ago. The exoskeletons of arthropods are crucial because they provide protection against predators and parasites, but also restrict their growth. All living and extinct arthropods must therefore periodically moult (shed) their exoskeletons; an incredibly risky event during which many individuals die. Due to its importance, it is presumed that exoskeleton moulting impacted the broad-scale evolution of arthropod morphology (their physical characteristics), behaviour, and ecology. Trilobite moults are preserved in great number in the fossil record, and this can tell us much about their moulting behaviour. Additionally, trilobites appear to be unique in showing many different moulting behaviours. However, we do not know why trilobites were so variable in their moulting behaviour, or what impact this had on their evolution. In this study, a large dataset of trilobite moulting behaviours and their body proportion (morphometry) measurements is presented and analysed to answer: Was variability in trilobite moulting behaviour related to differences in their morphometry? The results suggest that there was little association between the moulting behaviours shown by trilobites and their morphometry. Species showing the different moulting behaviours had overall similar morphologies, although for one moulting behaviour this seemed more limited. Only thorax length and segmentation (the central part of the body), and pygidium ( tail) width, significantly differed between species showing the different moulting behaviours. This study does not indicate a strong relationship between moulting behaviour and morphology in trilobites. This is unexpected, and leaves open the mystery of trilobite moulting variability.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Drage, H. B.. 2022-12-14. Trilobite moulting behaviour variability had little association with morphometry. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.12.520015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Constraining Palaeogeography and Palaeotides for the Cambrian using cnidarian medusae

The ocean tides influence key Earth system processes at a range of spatial and temporal scales. It is known that the geometry of ocean basins is the leading controller of tidal energetics, so well-constrained palaeogeographic reconstructions and tidal properties for Earths past are imperative when investigating other Earth system processes. Here, we present a novel way to constrain both deep-time tidal model results and reconstructions, by combining palaeoecology with sedimentology. We compare new palaeo-tidal model simulations for the Cambrian period, significant for the early origin and radiation of major animal fauna, to tidal proxies. One of the most abundant soft-bodied organisms preserved during this time are cnidarian medusae (jellyfish). A total of 17 cnidarian medusae localities were obtained through the literature, which had an adequate global distribution and occurred at regular intervals throughout the period of study. In some locations there were also estimates of palaeo-tidal range. Our results show a good agreement between the simulations and proxy data. In the few locations where there is disagreement, it is proposed that the palaeogeographic reconstructions are missing details, e.g., island chains, and our results allow for the palaeogeographic reconstructions to be improved. The proxy method presented is promising and can be applied to other time-periods with different marine fossils, particularly at evolutionary and extinction periods where the marginal marine environment is of importance.

paleontology↗

Introducing Isotopia: a stable isotope database for Classical Antiquity

We present Isotopia, an open-access database compiling over 36,000 stable isotope measurements ({delta}13C, {delta}15N, {delta}18O, {delta}34S, 87Sr/86Sr, 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, 208Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/206Pb, and 208Pb/206Pb) on human, animal, and plant bioarchaeological remains dating to Classical Antiquity (approximately 800 BCE - 500 CE). These were recovered from different European regions, particularly from the Mediterranean. Isotopia provides a comprehensive characterisation of the isotopic data, encompassing various historical, archaeological, biological, and environmental variables. Isotopia is a resource for meta-analytical research of past human activities and paleoenvironments. The database highlights data gaps in isotopic classical archaeology, such as the limited number of isotopic measurements available for plants and animals, limited number of studies on spatial mobility, and spatial heterogeneity of isotopic research. As such, we emphasise the necessity to address and fill these gaps in order to unlock the reuse potential of this database.

paleontology↗

Low-invasive sampling method for taxonomic for the identification of archaeological and paleontological bones by proteomics of their collagens

Collagen from paleontological bones is an important organic material for isotopic measurement, radiocarbon and paleoproteomic analyzes, to provide information on diet, dating and taxonomy. Current paleoproteomics methods are destructive and require from a few milligrams to several tenths of milligrams of bone for analysis. In many cultures, bones are raw materials for artefact which are conserved in museum which hampers to damage these precious objects during sampling. Here, we describe a low-invasive sampling method that identifies collagen, taxonomy and post-translational modifications from Holocene and Upper Pleistocene bones dated to 130,000 and 150 BC using dermatological skin tape-discs for sampling. The sampled bone micro-powders were digested following our highly optimized eFASP protocol, then analyzed by MALDI FTICR MS and LC-MS/MS for identifying the genus taxa of the bones. We show that this low-invasive sampling does not deteriorate the bones and achieves results similar to those obtained by more destructive sampling. Moreover, this sampling method can be performed at archaeological sites or in museums.

paleontology↗