bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.12.04.518984
Discordant results among MHC binding affinity prediction tools
Abstract
A large number of machine learning-based Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) binding affinity (BA) prediction tools have been developed and are widely used for both investigational and therapeutic applications, so it is important to explore differences in tool outputs. We examined predictions of four popular tools (netMHCpan, HLAthena, MHCflurry, and MHCnuggets) across a range of possible peptide sources (human, viral, and randomly generated) and MHC class I alleles. We uncovered inconsistencies in predictions of BA, allele promiscuity and the relationship between physical properties of peptides by source and BA predictions, as well as quality of training data. Our work raises fundamental questions about the fidelity of peptide-MHC binding prediction tools and their real-world implications.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Nguyen, A., Nellore, A., Thompson, R. F.. 2022-12-07. Discordant results among MHC binding affinity prediction tools. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.04.518984
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.