Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.11.10.516028

More hot air: measuring the paradox of European ecology conferences

Abstract

As scientists we cause an above average carbon footprint for work-related travel. International conferences are a common way for us to meet and discuss, and we do not address the environmental costs of these meetings. Knowing the costs might help us to reduce them. Here we estimated the carbon footprint of the last five physical conferences of the European Wildlife Disease Association (EWDA). We obtained the number of participants from each country for those conferences, and along with assumed travel options, commuting, accommodation, meals and printing, estimated the carbon emissions for each conference. The estimate ranged from 155 to 1205 tons CO2 per conference, or 0.7 to 2.4 tons per person. The outlying upper value was due to one joint global conference of the EWDA and the American mother association (WDA), which takes place every eight years. The geocentre was calculated for both the country of origin of the average conference attendants and for the society membership. The former was located in Luxembourg, and the latter near Dusseldorf, Germany, just approximately 170 km to the north. This represents the shortest total distance attendees would travel. Air transport to the conference country was the major source of CO2 emissions (87-97%), and the average distance flown per person increased from 1000 km (2010) to over 2000 km (2018), since later conferences were generally further from the geocentre. The biggest reduction in carbon emissions (up to 100 tons CO2) could therefore be achieved by decreasing air travel. This could be brought about by reducing the overall travel distance to the conference, i.e. a conference location near the membership geocentre, or - by a lesser amount - by encouraging travel to the conference by train or bus, i.e. conference location near good public travel hubs, and by promoting virtual attendance. Minor but yet substantial savings could be made elsewhere (2-6 tons CO2), including providing accommodation in greener hotels located closer to the conference venue and offering vegan/local food as the default option.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Smith, G. C., Begeman, L., Coles, A., Gilot-Fromont, E., Lopez-Olvera, J. R., Vale, A., Vogler, B. R., Kuiken, T.. 2022-11-13. More hot air: measuring the paradox of European ecology conferences. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.10.516028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗