Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.10.20.513002

SARS-CoV2 E and 3a proteins are inducers of pannexin currents

Abstract

Controversial reports have suggested that SARS-CoV E and 3a proteins may be viroporins that conduct currents through the plasma membrane of the infected cells. If true, these proteins would represent accessible targets for the development of new antiviral drugs by using high-throughput patch-clamp techniques. Here we aimed at better characterizing the cell responses induced by E or 3a protein with a particular focus on the ion conductances measured at the cell surface. First, we show that expression of SARS-CoV-2 E or 3a protein in CHO cells gives rise to cells with newly-acquired round shape, tending to detach from the Petri dish. This suggests that cell death is induced upon expression of E or 3a protein. We confirmed this hypothesis by using flow cytometry, in agreement with earlier reports on other cell types. In adhering cells expressing E or 3a protein, whole-cell currents were in fact not different from the control condition indicating that E and 3a proteins are not plasma membrane viroporins. In contrast, recording currents on detached cells uncovered outwardly-rectifying currents, much larger than those observed in control. The current characteristics are reminiscent of what was previously observed in cells expressing SARS-CoV-1 E or 3a proteins. Herein, we illustrate for the first time that carbenoxolone blocks these outward currents suggesting that they are conducted by pannexin channels, mostly likely activated by cell morphology change and/or cell death. Alongside we also demonstrate that truncation of the C-terminal PDZ binding motifs reduces the proportion of dying cells but does not prevent pannexin currents suggesting distinct pathways for cell death and pannexin currents induced by E and 3a proteins. We conclude that SARS-CoV-2 E and 3a proteins are not acting as viroporins expressed at the plasma membrane. Author SummaryA viroporin (or viral porin) is a class of proteins that is encoded by a virus genome. It is named porin because its biological role is to conduct ions through a pore that it created in a lipid membrane such as the one surrounding a human cell. if such viroporin is present at the external membrane of a human cell infected by a virus, it can be an easy target of an antiviral agent which thus does not have to enter the cell to be active. One example of viroporin is the flu M2 protein that is the target of amantadine, an antiviral agent used against flu. In previous studies, two proteins of SARS-CoV viruses, named E protein and 3a protein, have been suggested to be viroporins at the surface of infected human cells, potentially opening a new research avenue against SARS. Here we demonstrate that both proteins are not viroporins at the external membrane but they rather trigger changes in the cell shape and promote cell death. They only indirectly induce the activity of a porin that is encoded by the cell genome, named pannexin.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Oliveira Mendes, B., Alameh, M., Ollivier, B., Montnach, J., Bidere, N., Souaze, F., Escriou, N., Charpentier, F., Baro, I., De Waard, M., Loussouarn, G.. 2022-10-20. SARS-CoV2 E and 3a proteins are inducers of pannexin currents. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.20.513002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A dynamic phosphoproteome reveals stage-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Leishmania

Leishmania parasites undergo extensive morphological and metabolic remodelling during their transition from motile insect promastigotes to non-motile intracellular amastigotes, yet how dynamic protein kinase signalling drives this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a high-resolution temporal phosphoproteome of L. mexicana promastigote to axenic amastigote differentiation, profiling 16,495 phosphosites on 3,101 proteins across seven developmental time points and identifying 5,795 dynamically regulated sites. This temporal map reveals stage-specific signalling programs, including regulated sites in MPK2 and non-regulated sites in MRK1, protein kinases known to be essential for amastigote differentiation. Using analogue-sensitive (AS) chemical genetics, we show that acute inhibition of either kinase in axenic amastigotes disrupts the spatial coordination of cleavage furrow ingression with nuclear and kinetoplast segregation, revealing essential cytokinesis roles obscured in constitutive gene deletions. Despite generating similar cytokinesis phenotypes, genetic over-expression and cellular localisation analyses demonstrate that MPK2 and MRK1 act through spatially segregated signalling pathways. Time-resolved phosphoproteomics upon MPK2 inhibition places its activity upstream of cytoskeletal remodelling networks. Importantly, we show that the stage-specific requirement for MPK2 is defined by the parasite's morphology: while motile promastigotes tolerate MPK2 inhibition, genetic ablation of flagellar motility sensitises them to loss of MPK2 activity. Thus, flagellar motility acts as a mechanical buffer during promastigote division, explaining why non-motile amastigotes are vulnerable to MPK2 inhibition. Together, our findings provide a systems level framework for Leishmania signalling and demonstrate that cellular architecture and biomechanics dictate protein kinase dependency across developmental stages of the parasite.

cell biology↗

Single-cell Transcriptome-Proteome-PTMome(x8)-Metabolome (scTPPM) co-profiling decodes multimodal regulation during mouse oocyte meiosis

Single-cell multi-omics technology is crucial for comprehensive characterization of cellular molecular features. Despite recent advances in single-cell multi-omics approaches, co-profiling of nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the same cell individuals remains major challenges. Here, we developed a single-cell transcriptome, proteome, PTMome, and metabolome (scTPPM) profiling approach, enabling simultaneous analysis of transcriptomes, proteomes, eight types of PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, O_GlcNAc, acetylation, crotonylation, lactylation, and succinylation), and metabolomes in individual cells. We demonstrated the scTPPM's performance in tumor cell lines and oocyte samples, reaching total identification and quantification of 27,668 genes, 4,847 proteins, 1,508 PTM sites, and 680 metabolites in single mouse oocytes. We profiled previously-uncharacterized dynamic crosstalk among the entire metabolic pathways from metabolic enzyme expression and regulation to metabolite-mediated post-translational modifications during oocyte maturation. In summary, scTPPM provided an effective workflow for multi-omics co-profiling in single cells, enabling multi-layered insights into complex regulatory network.

cell biology↗

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗