Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.09.26.508383

Evolutionary history of Euteliidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea)

Abstract

The Euteliidae stand apart in the Noctuoidea as the second smallest family, but most highly specialized in terms of larval hostplant relationships, favouring plant families with high levels of resin or latex, including the family dominant in Oriental lowland forests, the Dipterocarpaceae. Given the proportionally large foliage biomass represented by dipterocarps, exploitation of this abundant resource by lepidopteran defoliators is surprisingly low, and the Euteliidae may have achieved this through pre-adaption to dipterocarp chemical defences. Therefore, to assess this, we performed a molecular phylogenetic analysis on the family Euteliidae to clarify deep divergences and elucidate evolutionary relationships at the level of the subfamily, tribe, and genus. Our dataset consists of 6.3 kbp of one mitochondrial and seven nuclear DNA loci and was analyzed using model-based phylogenetic methods, i.e., maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. We attempted to diagnose apomorphic morphological character states for Euteliidae and each monophyletic group within the family. Additionally, the evolution of hostplant use was reconstructed and a molecular-dating approach was conducted to assess the ages of major lineages within Euteliidae. We present an updated phylogenetic hypothesis for Euteliidae consisting of two strongly supported subfamilies: Euteliinae and Stictopterinae. Within Stictopterinae there are two tribes: Stictopterini and Odontodini. Several genera (e.g., Targalla, Paectes, Marathyssa, Eutelia) were found to be polyphyletic and require taxonomic revision. Two new genera (Niklastelia and Pellinentelia) are described and several taxonomic changes (e.g., new combinations and new synonymies) are made. The Neotropical genus Thyriodes, currently included in Euteliidae, is found to be associated with Erebinae (Erebidae). The divergence time estimate for the split between the Euteliidae and Noctuidae is at 53 my, and the Euteliidae split into the subfamilies Euteliinae and Stictopterinae at 42 my. In Stictopterinae, the tribes Stictopterini and Odontodini split at 31 my and the Euteliinae began a much more complex diversification at 34 my. Ancestral hostplant reconstruction identified Malpighiales (e.g., Clusiaceae) as the ancestral larval hostplant order for the family Euteliidae. The ancestors of Stictopterinae also appear to have been Malpighiales feeders, but then split into exclusive specialisms on Malvales (Odontodini) and Malpighiales (Stictopterini) hostplants. Larvae of Stictopterini appear to be restricted to Clusiaceae, apart from a few records from Dipterocarpaceae. In Euteliinae, Anacardiaceae are predominant as larval hosts. Thus, all hosts in the family are lactiferous, possibly providing some degree of pre-adaptation for exploiting Dipterocarpaceae.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zahiri, R., Holloway, J. D., Rota, J., Schmidt, C., Pellinen, M. J., Kitching, I. J., Miller, S. E., Wahlberg, N.. 2022-09-27. Evolutionary history of Euteliidae (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.26.508383

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗