Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.09.09.507334

Meiotic drive does not impede success in sperm competition in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni

Abstract

In male X-linked meiotic drive systems, the driver causes degeneration of Y-bearing sperm, leading to female-biased offspring sex ratios. This potentially leads to a two-fold transmission advantage to drive chromosomes. However, drive-bearing sperm often do poorly in sperm competition, limiting their ability to spread. We use the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni, to investigate the success of the X-linked Sex Ratio (SR) meiotic drive system. In this species, polyandrous matings, where a female mates with multiple males, are common. Recent findings demonstrate SR males transfer the same numbers of viable sperm as wildtype (ST) males during mating, implying that they do not necessarily have reduced fertility under sperm competition. Reciprocal mating trials were performed to measure the success of SR and ST sperm in double mated females, with either a SR or ST male mated first followed by a male of the alternative genotype. There was no significant difference in the number of offspring sired by SR and ST males. This equivalence held regardless of whether the SR male mated first or second. We show these results are consistent with previous studies that suggested SR male sperm do poorly in sperm competition. Future experiments will determine whether the competitive ability of SR males is maintained under higher stress conditions likely to be experienced in nature, in which females mate repeatedly with multiple males. The results from the current study helps to explain the high meiotic drive frequency of around 20% in wild populations in this species. Impact SummaryMeiotic drive genes are selfish genetic elements that distort Mendelian patterns of inheritance to bias transmission in their favour. We use the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni, to investigate the fitness effects associated with a meiotic drive gene called Sex Ratio (SR), which is linked to the X chromosome. In males, SR destroys Y-bearing sperm, meaning only X-bearing sperm are viable, and females who mate with drive males sire all-female broods. This confers a two-fold transmission advantage to the SR gene, as it is transmitted to all offspring. We recently discovered that drive males have evolved compensatory mechanisms to cope with the sperm destruction caused by meiotic drive. They have greatly enlarged testes, allowing them to produce more sperm. When drive males mate with females, they deliver as many sperm and sire as many offspring as wildtype males. Building on this finding, we measured how drive male sperm performs against sperm from a non-carrier male in sperm competition - where the sperm from different males compete to fertilise an egg. Double mating trials were performed, where a single female was mated once to a drive and once to a non-carrier male. By genotyping offspring, we show that the number of offspring sired by the drive male was not different from the number sired by the non-carrier competitor. These findings contrast with those in other species. Typically, drive males do poorly in sperm competition and their spread is severely restricted by sperm competition. In stalk-eyed flies, female multiple mating with many males is the norm, but this does not appear to inhibit the fertility of drive males. The success of drive under sperm competition helps to explain the high frequency of drive around 20% in natural populations of T. dalmanni.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bates, S., Meade, L. C., Pomiankowski, A.. 2022-09-13. Meiotic drive does not impede success in sperm competition in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.09.507334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Isoform inflation and annotation heterogeneity can confound Kunitz-repertoire comparisons in blood-feeding animals: a gene-level reappraisal

Hematophagy has arisen independently many times across Metazoa, and recurrent anticoagulant protein families in blood-feeders are often read as convergent recruitment - the Kunitz/BPTI domain a paradigm case, with the leech an oft-cited low-Kunitz exception. We re-examine this at the gene level and ask whether a confirmatory cross-phylum test of this blood-feeding/anticoagulant association is feasible with public genomes. Applying an auditable gene-level protocol (one longest-isoform representative per gene; conservation-checked protein to gene mapping) to eight metazoan lineages, we find no consistent, universal elevation of whole-genome gene-level Kunitz-repertoire size in these blood-feeders (blood-feeder median 18 genes vs non-blood-feeder median 39; a descriptive comparison of non-independent taxa, not a formal test). Protein-entry counts inflate gene-level Kunitz counts by up to ~4.6x (mosquito 23 to 5), and neither this inflation nor proteome-wide isoform density (1.0-2.7x) tracks diet, so protein-entry comparisons are an unreliable basis for repertoire claims. Separately, deterministic bookkeeping under a fixed topology and a no-reversal rule counts 12 independent blood-feeding origins (11 if the ancestral lamprey is treated as parasitic with two losses); a non-exhaustive screen of annotated public genomes yielded only one candidate blood/non-blood pair (bedbug), and, under the pre-registered simulation scenario, only a cross-origin heterogeneity endpoint is attainable within a realistic origin ceiling, and only under strong heterogeneity (among-origin SD >= 3-4). An exploratory, feasibility-grade secretome-composition estimate did not meet the pre-registered criterion. We offer a gene-level, annotation-aware re-analysis, a caution about isoform/annotation bias in cross-phylum comparisons, and an account of what current data can and cannot support.

evolutionary biology↗

Denisovan introgression left differential selection regimes in Humans and Neanderthals on the SLC30A9 gene

Signals of positive selection around the SLC30A9 gene have been reported in human populations outside Africa. Selection likely acted on a highly differentiated single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs1047626, leading to a non-synonymous substitution in the encoded zinc transporter. Because of the striking similarity between the putatively selected SLC30A9 haplotype observed in several current human populations and the Denisovan individual, previous work has proposed adaptive introgression. Yet alternative explanations, including ancient human variation, and the precise archaic source -Neanderthal or Denisovan- remained unresolved. Considering the potentially complex evolution of SLC30A9, we applied Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithms coupled to machine learning to investigate the most plausible evolutionary origin of this substitution. After modelling different evolutionary scenarios with forward-in-time simulations, our results highlight that the most probable scenario is a Denisovan origin of the rs1047626 polymorphism. However, the allele likely introgressed into Neanderthals first and was then passed into non-African modern humans. Moreover, the derived allele frequency for rs1047626 across several African populations is consistent with back-to-Africa migrations. Finally, our ABC analyses indicate strong positive selection in East Asian populations and other out-of-Africa populations, whereas in Neanderthal populations, the selection coefficient was probably neutral or slightly deleterious.

evolutionary biology↗

Distinct associative learning abilities for colour and odour in the flower-feeding Drosophila elegans and the fruit-feeding Drosophila melanogaster

Animal behaviour is both innately constrained and shaped by learning. This mosaic organization has evolved in response to species-specific ecological demands and may differ between sensory modalities. Flower-visiting animals are a particularly useful system for investigating the relationship between sensory ecology and learning because they rely on multiple floral cues, particularly odour and colour, to locate food sources. However, it remains largely unexplored whether specialization on floral resources entails divergence in learning abilities across sensory modalities. Drosophila elegans is a flower-feeding species that depends heavily on floral resources throughout its life; adults spend much of their time on flowers and larvae develop on fallen flower leaves. Here, we compared odour-reward and colour-reward associative learning between the flower-feeding D. elegans and the fruit-feeding D. melanogaster. We found that, under conditions of equilibrated motivation, odour- and colour-preference, and using the same sugar reward, D. elegans exhibited poorer odour-reward learning performance but better colour-reward learning performance than D. melanogaster. These results suggest that the modality-specific eligibility of sensory information to enter into associations, known as the 'Garcia-effect' in experimental psychology, can evolve oppositely between species. This highlights the relationship between ecological specialization and mnemonic processing, and shows that biological 'intelligence' is not general.

evolutionary biology↗