Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.07.26.501572

Endosome positioning coordinates spatially selective GPCR signaling

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a class of critical regulators of mammalian physiology, can initiate unique functional responses depending on the subcellular compartment of their activation. Yet, how endosomal receptors transduce location-biased outcomes remains poorly understood. Efforts to uncover the mechanistic basis of compartmentalized GPCR signaling have largely focused on the biochemical aspect of this regulation through dissection of the relevant factors. Here, we assess the biophysical positioning of receptor-containing endosomes as an alternative salient mechanism coordinating the transduction of spatially biased responses. We focus on the prototypical beta2-adrenergic receptor ({beta}2-AR), which preferentially mediates transcriptional reprogramming via cyclic AMP (cAMP) production from early endosomes. We overcome a technical challenge that has hindered the direct assessment of the role of endosome positioning in this paradigm by devising a strategy to selectively and rapidly redistribute endosomes on command in intact cells without perturbing their biochemical composition. Next, we present two complementary optical readouts that enable robust measurements of bulk- and gene-specific GPCR/cAMP-dependent transcription with single-cell resolution. We then combine these readouts with rapid endosome relocalization to establish that increasing endosome distance from the nucleus inhibits the initiation of the endosome-dependent response. Lastly, we demonstrate a prominent mechanistic role of phosphodiesterase (PDE)-mediated cAMP hydrolysis in this process. Our study, therefore, illuminates a novel mechanism regulating GPCR function by identifying endosome positioning as a principal mediator of spatially selective receptor signaling. SummaryG protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) orchestrate essential aspects of mammalian physiology. GPCR function is tightly controlled by endocytic trafficking, where the ligand-activated receptor engages arrestins and clathrin machinery and is subsequently internalized into endosomal compartments1. While the endosome-associated receptor pool was classically presumed to be functionally inactive, it is now clear that receptors can also signal from endosomes2-4. Moreover, endosomal receptors can initiate cellular responses that are distinct from those activated at the plasma membrane. Transcriptional reprogramming was one of the first location-biased GPCR responses to be identified and shown to be stimulated from intracellular receptors5, 6. Since then, compartmentalized signaling has been implicated in the transduction of distinct phosphosignaling7, 8 and in the coordination of unique physiologies and drug actions8-17. Yet, how the endosome selectively facilitates these responses compared to other subcellular compartments remains unclear.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Willette, B. K. A., Tsvetanova, N.. 2022-07-26. Endosome positioning coordinates spatially selective GPCR signaling. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.26.501572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A dynamic phosphoproteome reveals stage-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Leishmania

Leishmania parasites undergo extensive morphological and metabolic remodelling during their transition from motile insect promastigotes to non-motile intracellular amastigotes, yet how dynamic protein kinase signalling drives this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a high-resolution temporal phosphoproteome of L. mexicana promastigote to axenic amastigote differentiation, profiling 16,495 phosphosites on 3,101 proteins across seven developmental time points and identifying 5,795 dynamically regulated sites. This temporal map reveals stage-specific signalling programs, including regulated sites in MPK2 and non-regulated sites in MRK1, protein kinases known to be essential for amastigote differentiation. Using analogue-sensitive (AS) chemical genetics, we show that acute inhibition of either kinase in axenic amastigotes disrupts the spatial coordination of cleavage furrow ingression with nuclear and kinetoplast segregation, revealing essential cytokinesis roles obscured in constitutive gene deletions. Despite generating similar cytokinesis phenotypes, genetic over-expression and cellular localisation analyses demonstrate that MPK2 and MRK1 act through spatially segregated signalling pathways. Time-resolved phosphoproteomics upon MPK2 inhibition places its activity upstream of cytoskeletal remodelling networks. Importantly, we show that the stage-specific requirement for MPK2 is defined by the parasite's morphology: while motile promastigotes tolerate MPK2 inhibition, genetic ablation of flagellar motility sensitises them to loss of MPK2 activity. Thus, flagellar motility acts as a mechanical buffer during promastigote division, explaining why non-motile amastigotes are vulnerable to MPK2 inhibition. Together, our findings provide a systems level framework for Leishmania signalling and demonstrate that cellular architecture and biomechanics dictate protein kinase dependency across developmental stages of the parasite.

cell biology↗

Single-cell Transcriptome-Proteome-PTMome(x8)-Metabolome (scTPPM) co-profiling decodes multimodal regulation during mouse oocyte meiosis

Single-cell multi-omics technology is crucial for comprehensive characterization of cellular molecular features. Despite recent advances in single-cell multi-omics approaches, co-profiling of nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the same cell individuals remains major challenges. Here, we developed a single-cell transcriptome, proteome, PTMome, and metabolome (scTPPM) profiling approach, enabling simultaneous analysis of transcriptomes, proteomes, eight types of PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, O_GlcNAc, acetylation, crotonylation, lactylation, and succinylation), and metabolomes in individual cells. We demonstrated the scTPPM's performance in tumor cell lines and oocyte samples, reaching total identification and quantification of 27,668 genes, 4,847 proteins, 1,508 PTM sites, and 680 metabolites in single mouse oocytes. We profiled previously-uncharacterized dynamic crosstalk among the entire metabolic pathways from metabolic enzyme expression and regulation to metabolite-mediated post-translational modifications during oocyte maturation. In summary, scTPPM provided an effective workflow for multi-omics co-profiling in single cells, enabling multi-layered insights into complex regulatory network.

cell biology↗

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗