Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.07.11.499549

What drives mixed-species shoaling among wild zebrafish? Role of predators, food access, abundance of conspecifics, and kin familiarity

Abstract

Mixed-species groups commonly occur across a wide range of faunal communities and are known to provide several benefits to members. While zebrafish have often been observed to form mixed-species shoals with coexisting species, the factors determining their occurrence is not yet understood. Using laboratory-based experiments, we decipher the main ecological drivers of mixed-species shoaling in these tropical fish communities. Shoals comprising zebrafish (Danio rerio), flying barbs (Esomus danricus) and whitespots (Aplocheilus panchax) were collected from a stagnant canal at Haringhata (West Bengal, India). Experiments to assess foraging efficiency were conducted where single or mixed-species shoals (comprising 5 individuals) were given low or high amounts of food. Shoal choice experiments were also conducted to assess the preferences of test subjects (zebrafish individuals) for forming associations based on shoal composition and familiarity. Results from experiments on feeding efficiency revealed that foraging time varied substantially among the shoal types (i.e., single or mixed-species), and was dependent on the quantity of food available, but not linked to the body size of species composing the shoal. The choice experiments to examine preference for associations revealed that under predator risk, zebrafish associate more with mixed shoals, and showed comparable associations to shoals differing in the abundance of conspecifics. Furthermore, we found that zebrafish preferred to associate with familiar conspecific over unfamiliar mixed and unfamiliar conspecific shoals. Therefore, equitable food consumption in mixed shoals, greater association to mixed shoals in presence of predator and familiarity were found to be important drivers for choosing mixed-species shoaling by zebrafish.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mukherjee, I., Bhat, A.. 2022-07-12. What drives mixed-species shoaling among wild zebrafish? Role of predators, food access, abundance of conspecifics, and kin familiarity. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.11.499549

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Brinkmanship and the sensory-motor limits of pursuit predation

Predators routinely fail to capture prey despite being larger, faster, and more powerful. Half a century ago, theory predicted that prey could evade biomechanically superior predators using brinkmanship, delaying evasive maneuvers until the last possible instant, but this hypothesis has never been tested in the wild. Here, using more than 2,000 hours of high-speed stereo-camera recordings of predator and prey coral reef fishes, we show that prey successfully evade 97% of attacks. However, contrary to the standard explanation that prey evade through superior maneuverability, we find that prey evade by exploiting their predator's sensory-motor delay - the interval between a stimulus reaching the predator and the onset of the predator's motor response. Although predators partially compensate for this by forecasting prey position during interception steering, prey consistently time evasive maneuvers within a brief window just tens of milliseconds before collision, within which no viable predator trajectory can intercept them. Prey do not, however, turn at the time that maximizes miss distance, but slightly later, a bias that makes escape robust to variability in their own response timing. These findings reveal how temporal delays in perception and action place fundamental limits on the outcome of predator-prey interactions, and show that prey can exploit delays in a way that approaches the theoretical limit of escape performance.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Automated pup-level analysis reveals distinct effects of prenatal CBD and THC exposure on maternal retrieval

This study examined how prenatal CBD and {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure affects maternal caregiving in C57BL/6J mice. We developed the Machine-Automated Scoring of the Pup Retrieval Test (MAS-PRT) to overcome limitations of manual behavioral scoring. MAS-PRT integrates Multi-Animal DeepLabCut for dam and pup tracking with Detectron2 for dynamic nest reconstruction. Validated against 170 manually annotated retrieval trials, the pipeline showed high concordance with manual measurements and enabled reproducible extraction of encounter latency, retrieval latency, and locomotor trajectories. Prenatal exposure did not impair general nest-building or overall home-cage maternal care. However, pups from both CBD and THC groups showed reduced body weight at postnatal day 5. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed divergent effects by compound: CBD-exposed dams exhibited a weight-dependent increase in probability of encountering and retrieving lighter pups, independent of pup sex. Spatial tracking further showed that dams traversed significantly shorter total trajectories when retrieving female progeny exposed to either compound. Longitudinal trial-by-trial analysis indicated intact task acquisition in controls and CBD dams, whereas THC dams displayed a flattened learning curve driven by lower retrieval latencies on initial trials. Together, these findings indicate that prenatal cannabinoid exposure does not produce generalized disruption of maternal care but instead induces compound-specific alterations in maternal reactivity, retrieval kinematics, and learning dynamics.

animal behavior and cognition↗

A comparison of female competitive traits: Female aggression peaks at nest building but female song spans multiple contexts in a temperate songbird

Female-female competition is increasingly recognized as a key driver of female ornamentation, including birdsong, which often functions in intrasexual competition. However, the specific resources females use elaborate traits to compete for remain unclear. In addition, few studies have simultaneously investigated the use of multiple competitive traits in females, despite growing independent interest in these traits (e.g., female song and aggression). We investigated the competitive contexts of female song, aggression and calling behavior in northern house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) to determine which resources females compete for across the breeding season. We simulated conspecific territorial intrusions using female song at three breeding stages representing different contexts: arrival (mate and territory acquisition), nest building (nest site and breeding status defense), and egg laying (brood defense). We tested whether female song and physical aggression varied as reproductive resources shifted across the breeding cycle. Females were significantly more aggressive during nest building, showing 5.8 times greater odds of a higher-intensity aggressive response during nest building compared to arrival. Female song output was similar across early stages but declined during egg laying, though this was not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons and individuals varied substantially in overall singing propensity. Non-song vocalizations varied by call type and breeding stage. Calls associated with aggression occurred most frequently during nest building, consistent with peak physical aggression responses. Together, these results identify nest building as the stage of highest female aggression, consistent with heightened competition over nest cavities and associated breeding status in this cavity-nesting species. In contrast, female song occurred across all stages and appears to function in multiple competitive contexts. This study provides evidence for context and mode-specific female signaling in a temperate songbird and highlights that females strategically use aggression, calls, and song to mediate social conflict across breeding contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗