Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.05.30.493950

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and the long-term impact of meteorological , environmental and socio-economic factors of scrub typhus in China from 2012 to 2018

Abstract

Large-scale outbreaks of scrub typhus combined with the emergence of this vector-borne rickettsiosis in new areas indicate that this disease remains seriously neglected. This study aimed to explore the long-term changes and regional leading factors of scrub typhus in China, so as to provide fresh insights for the prevention and control of this disease. In this study, a Bayesian space-time hierarchical model (BSTHM) was used to identify the long-term spatiotemporal heterogeneity of scrub typhus and quantify the association between meteorological factors and scrub typhus in southern and northern China from 2012 to 2018. GeoDetector model was used to quantify the dominant forces of environmental and socioeconomic factors in the Northern and the Southern China. Scrub typhus often appeared in summer and autumn (June to November), and epidemically peaked in October, with obvious temporal seasonality. Spatially, the hot spots (high-risk regions) were concentrated in the south, on the contrary the cold spots (low-risk regions) in the north. In addition, the main meteorological factor, average temperature, gave a significant impact in both areas. The average temperature increased by 1 {degrees}C, resulting in a decrease of 1.10% in southern China and an increase of 0.96% in northern China in the risk of scrub typhus. The determinant environmental and socio-economic factors of scrub typhus in the two areas were altitude and per capita GDP, with q-values of 0.91 and 0.87, respectively. Meteorological, environmental and socio-economic factors had a significant impact on the distribution of scrub typhus, with obvious seasonality and spatial heterogeneity. This study provides helpful suggestions and basis for reasonably allocating resources and controlling the occurrence of scrub typhus. Author summaryScrub typhus is a natural-focus disease caused by the bite of chigger mite larval. In this study, we use BSTHM to capture the overall temporal trend and spatial hot spots of scrub typhus, and quantify the relationship between the disease and major meteorological factors. Meanwhile, Geodetector model was used to quantify the influence of other potential risk factors and estimate the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of scrub typhus. The results showed that scrub typhus had significant seasonality, with a q value of 0.52, and spatial heterogeneity, with a q-value of 0.64. Scrub typhus mainly occurred in summer and autumn, and high-risk areas were mainly distributed in southern China (Yunnan, Hainan and Guangdong). These heterogeneity were closely related to the vector and host. Whether in the South or the north, scrub typhus was closely related to risk factors such as temperature, per capita GDP, NDVI, altitude and the percentage of children aged 0-14. These results suggest that the relevant departments should strengthen the monitoring of the ecological environment, the host and vector of Orientia tsutsugamushi, and strengthen the risk awareness, so as to prevent and control the possible increased risk of scrub typhus under these meteorological, environmental and socio-economic conditions. Considering the differences in different regions, resources should be allocated reasonably.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qian, J., Zhu, C., Lv, H., Chu, H., He, J., Wang, C., Qi, Y., Luo, Y., Yue, N., Wu, Y., Ye, F., Yi, J., Tan, W.-l.. 2022-05-30. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and the long-term impact of meteorological , environmental and socio-economic factors of scrub typhus in China from 2012 to 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.493950

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗