Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.04.04.486928

Detection of Dugbe virus from ticks in Ghana

Abstract

Vector-borne pathogens historically have impacted U.S. warfighters and active-duty personnel stationed both domestically and globally during deployments or forward operations. Tick-borne diseases continue to spread to new geographical regions affecting both animal and human health. In Ghana, there is limited information on the circulating tick-borne pathogens and their risk of infections. This military-to-military vector surveillance study focused on seven sites in Ghana: Navrongo, Airforce Base, 6th Battalion Infantry, Air Borne Force, Army Recruit Training School, 1st Battalion Infantry and 5th Battalion Infantry for detection of tick-borne pathogens. Ticks from these sites were collected by hand-picking with a pair of forceps from domesticated animals including cattle, sheep, goats and dogs. A total of 2,016 ticks were collected from two main ecological zones; the northern Sahel savannah and the coastal savannah. Amblyomma variegatum was the predominant species, accounting for 59.5% of the collected ticks. Next-generation sequencing allowed for Dugbe virus whole genome detection. This study reports the second detection of Dugbe virus in Ghana, which is closely related to Dugbe virus strains from Kenya and Nigeria. This study (sponsored by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch-Global Emerg-ing Infections Surveillance Section) aimed to better inform Force Health Protection (FHP) decisions within the U.S. AFRICOM area of responsibility, the Ghana Armed Forces, and enhance global health security countermeasures. Further surveillance needs to be conducted within the country to determine the distribution of tick-borne pathogens to formulate effective control measures. Author summaryThe prevalence of Dugbe virus in tick species within Ghana was investigated. This study involved seven sampling sites that covered two ecological zones, the northern Sahel savannah and the coastal savannah. About 2,000 ticks were collected from cattle, sheep, goats and dogs and identified using a dissecting microscope. The most predominant tick species was Amblyomma variegatum (59.5%) also known as the tropical bont tick. Using Next-generation sequencing, the full genome of Dugbe virus was for the first time in Ghana identified in A. variegatum. This positive Amblyomma variegatum was collected from the Greater Accra region of Ghana within a military site. The virus was found to be related to Dugbe virus strains from Kenya and Nigeria. Findings from this study show that the trade of livestock across borders facilitates the spread of tick-borne pathogens hence there is a need to enforce measures that prevent the importation of potentially harmful ticks and tick-borne pathogens.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Addae, C. A., Wiley, M., Pratt, C., Koehler, J. W., Addo, S. O., Mosore, M., Yeboah, C., Agbodzi, B., Ladzekpo, D., Tagoe, J. A., Behene, E., Adrah, I., Defeamekpo, C., Quaye, O., Letizia, A., Nimo-Paintsil, S., Arimoto, H., Diclaro, J. W., Dadzie, S.. 2022-04-08. Detection of Dugbe virus from ticks in Ghana. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.04.486928

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Auditing Biomedical Literature with Blinded AI Peer Review: Where Peer Review Works, Where It Fails, and How to Strengthen It

Biomedical publishing has grown more than elevenfold since 1991, outstripping human peer review. Unblinded language models cannot audit this literature objectively because they recognize famous authors and journals from training memory. We built BARS (Blinded AI Review System), an automated referee that strips titles, author names, institutions, journal headers, and dates before grading full-text manuscripts on a 10-point scale covering methods, evidence, biology, and reproducibility. We used BARS to generate 1,874 blind reviews across 1,714 unique papers. BARS passed 100% of verified sound controls, caught 77% to 91% of internally flawed papers, eliminated a +0.35-point prestige boost, and more than doubled human referee consistency. Across 320 recent open-access articles (2020-2025) from eight fields, 54% failed on core scientific rigor (<5.0/10; 41% excluding megajournals). Revision at selective journals improved preprints more than twice as much as revision at commercial megajournals (+0.62 vs. +0.30 points; baseline-adjusted p = 0.033), and BARS recalled 98% of unresolved human referee critiques across 100 open-review papers. Across 915 date-blinded papers from 1991 to 2025, average scores fell from 7.6/10 to 5.8/10 as megajournals and template database studies expanded. Blinded self-audits of 238 papers by two senior authors -- and of this manuscript itself -- caught real statistical, control, and table errors in our own work. At four cents per paper, BARS offers a practical quality check for authors, journals, and readers (https://veg.github.io/BARS/).

scientific communication and education↗

From Problems to Solutions: How Self-Questions Drive Strong Scientific Reasoning

Metacognition, or awareness and control of thinking, is essential for problem solving because it helps solvers select strategies for learning and decide when to enact them (planning), check their understanding in the moment (monitoring), and assess effectiveness of solutions and learning strategies (evaluating). Most studies that examine metacognition do so retrospectively, leaving a critical gap in how metacognition is used in-the-moment for problem solving. In this study, we utilized a think-aloud interview approach to capture and characterize the metacognitive skills that senior undergraduate life science students at three institution types in the United States used spontaneously while solving challenging biology problems. We found that the students (n = 39) displayed a wide variety and quantity of monitoring, some evaluating, and nearly no planning skills while creating a solution backed with high-quality reasoning. Students frequently used self-questions to monitor and evaluate their thinking. We found that self-questioning is a critical skill for generating solutions, but it only moves problem solving forward if the student asks and correctly answers the self-question out loud. This study illustrates how self-questioning and other metacognitive regulation skills provide links to bridge the gap between a student's prior knowledge and specific features of a challenging problem. Based on our student data, we conceptualized a model of metacognitive phases during problem solving with high-quality reasoning. Finally, we present a self-question scaffold to facilitate the proposed phases (planning, monitoring, reasoning, and evaluating) so educators can equip students with metacognitive and scientific reasoning tools for effective problem solving.

scientific communication and education↗

Preprint solicitation as a natural experiment in scholarly publishing

Preprinting is a growing and increasingly recognized mechanism for scientific communication and productivity and a way to facilitate global access to science. The interplay of preprinting practices with formal peer-reviewed publication is an open question that is now tractable to targeted analysis. Here, we take advantage of nearly a decade of preprint solicitation at Proceedings B to address this question, which offers a quasi-experimental setting for comparing outcomes for solicited preprints and traditionally submitted manuscripts. We used submission records from 15,368 manuscripts from 2018-2024 to assess whether preprint solicitation affects acceptance rates, journal scope, author geographic diversity, and post-publication uptake. Solicited manuscripts were accepted at nearly twice the rate of traditional submissions and received more downloads and citations after publication. Submission topics were broadly similar between the two routes, though solicited manuscripts showed marginally greater subject diversity. Geographic disparities favoring the Global North persisted, but acceptance rates for solicited manuscripts converged across regions, narrowing the gap seen in traditional submissions. These findings extend earlier work on this initiative and indicate that editor-driven solicitation can identify high-quality preprints, broaden geographic representation, and increase research visibility, offering a replicable model for journals seeking to diversify authorship while maintaining editorial standards.

scientific communication and education↗