Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.02.28.482226

In-vivo phase-dependent enhancement and suppression of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Haslacher, D.·Narang, A.·Cavallo, A.·Nasr, K.·Santarnecchi, E.·Soekadar, S.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can influence human perception and behavior, with recent evidence also suggesting its potential impact in clinical settings, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Behavioral and indirect physiological evidence indicates that phase-dependent constructive and destructive interference between the tACS electric field and ongoing brain oscillations may play an important role, but direct in-vivo validation was infeasible because stimulation artifacts impeded such assessment. Using stimulation artifact source separation (SASS), a real-time compatible artifact suppression approach, we overcame this limitation and provide direct evidence for millisecond-by-millisecond phase-dependent enhancement and suppression of ongoing brain oscillations during amplitude-modulated tACS (AM-tACS) across 29 healthy human volunteers. We found that AM-tACS enhanced and suppressed targeted brain oscillations by 11.7 {+/-} 5.14% and 10.1 {+/-} 4.07% respectively. Millisecond-precise modulation of oscillations predicted modulation of behavior (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). These results not only provide direct evidence for constructive and destructive interference as a key mechanism of AM-tACS but suggest superiority of phase-locked (closed-loop) AM-tACS over conventional (open-loop) AM-tACS to purposefully enhance or suppress brain oscillations. SignificanceThe presented data provide direct evidence for a key mechanism underlying neurophysiological and behavioral effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), a broadly used neuromodulation approach that yields promising clinical results but also raised controversies because of its variable effects. Our findings not only elucidate the underlying mechanisms of tACS, but also provide the rationale for closed-loop tACS protocols that will enable targeted enhancement and suppression of brain oscillations related to various brain functions such perception, memory or cognition. Towards this end, we introduce the technical prerequisites to establish millisecond-to-millisecond precise closed-loop tACS protocols that will be important to advance tACS as a neuroscientific and clinical tool, for example in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haslacher, D., Narang, A., Cavallo, A., Nasr, K., Santarnecchi, E., Soekadar, S.. 2022-03-02. In-vivo phase-dependent enhancement and suppression of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.28.482226

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗