Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.02.17.480823

Choosing variant interpretation tools for clinical applications: context matters

Abstract

Our inability to solve the Variant Interpretation Problem (VIP) has become a bottleneck in the biomedical/clinical application of Next-Generation Sequencing. This situation has favored the development and use of bioinformatics tools for the VIP. However, choosing the optimal tool for our purposes is difficult because of the high variability of clinical contexts across and within countries. Here, we introduce the use of cost models as a new approach to compare pathogenicity predictors that considers clinical context. An interesting feature of this approach, absent in standard performance measures, is that it treats pathogenicity predictors as rejection classifiers. These classifiers, commonly found in machine learning applications to healthcare, reject low-confidence predictions. Finally, to explore whether context has any impact on predictor selection, we have developed a computational procedure that solves the problem of comparing an arbitrary number of tools across all possible clinical scenarios. We illustrate our approach using a set of seventeen pathogenicity predictors for missense variants. Our results show that there is no optimal predictor for all possible clinical scenarios. We also find that considering rejection gives a view of classifiers contrasting with that of standard performance measures. The Python code for comparing pathogenicity predictors across the clinical space using cost models is available to any interested user at: https://github.com/ClinicalTranslationalBioinformatics/clinical_space_partition SummariesJosu Aguirre earned his doctorate at the Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics group, at the Vall dHebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Natalia Padilla earned is a post-doctoral researcher at the Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics group, at the Vall dHebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Selen Ozkan is a Ph.D. student at the Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics group, at the Vall dHebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Casandra Riera earned her doctorate at the Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics group, at the Vall dHebron Institute of Research (VHIR). Lidia Feliubadalo earned her doctorate at the Universitat de Barcelona, presently she is a high-level technician working at the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) in the diagnosis of hereditary cancers. Xavier de la Cruz is ICREA Research Professor at the Vall dHebron Institute of Research (VHIR). His research interests revolve around the application of machine learning methods to healthcare problems.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aguirre, J., Padilla, N., Özkan, S., Riera, C., Feliubadalo, L., de la Cruz, X.. 2022-02-19. Choosing variant interpretation tools for clinical applications: context matters. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.17.480823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Accelerating discovery and integration from RNA to Protein with R2T2P

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data remains an unmet challenge in the post-genomics era, discouraging researchers from pursuing integrative approaches to molecular biology research. Leveraging the power of translation profiling, we present RNA to Translation to Protein (R2T2P), a computational platform integrating genome-guided transcriptome assembly with identification of translation and proteins, including a tailored differential analysis framework and support for multiple reference transcriptomes. We applied R2T2P to investigate a cellular model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), where ectopic expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle triggers significant alterations in transcription and RNA metabolism. We uncovered hundreds of uncharacterized, highly overexpressed RNAs, including antisense and alternative transcripts, and quantified their contribution to translatome and proteome. Re-analysis of expression datasets from patient-derived myotubes and muscle biopsies validated this alternative transcriptome in FSHD patients, adding a reservoir of bona-fide novel molecular actors in a rare disease. Available at https://github.com/nfdata-omics/R2T2P/, R2T2P is a flexible and powerful workflow in modern integrative biology.

bioinformatics↗

MorphoANOVA: Dissecting Histology-Gene Expression Relationships in Spatial Transcriptomics

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures the expression of hundreds to thousands of genes within tissue architecture, often accompanied by histology images. However, it remains challenging to systematically characterize which genes exhibit associations with tissue morphology, whether these associations vary spatially, and which genes show additional spatial expression patterns beyond those captured by morphology. Here we introduce MorphoANOVA, a gene-wise statistical framework for characterizing morphology--expression relationships across genes measured by ST. Using nested spatially varying coefficient models and sequential ANOVA, MorphoANOVA assesses slide-wide associations with an H\&E-derived morphology feature, location-specific changes in these associations, and additional spatial variation after accounting for the selected feature. The resulting statistics enable gene prioritization and pathway enrichment analysis, while spatial component maps support the interpretation of individual genes. Simulations demonstrate MorphoANOVA's ability to distinguish the modeled components and recover their spatial patterns. Applications to human cortex and breast cancer identify biological programs associated with different morphology--expression patterns and reveal distinct relationships with cell composition. Across three HER2-positive breast cancer patients, invasive-cancer marker genes consistently exhibit stronger evidence of location-specific morphology associations. MorphoANOVA thus provides a framework for systematically interpreting spatial gene-expression patterns in relation to tissue morphology.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation effects can rival reported concordance gains in cross-cancer survival prediction

Studies of cross-cancer learning for survival prediction from tumour omics have reported concordance gains of 0.020 and 0.045, but how such gains compare with evaluation effects remains unclear. We examined these effects across 13 TCGA cancers (5,761 patients, 1,526 disease-specific deaths), using five repeats of five-fold cross-validation and paired bootstrap intervals. When model selection did not use test data, our borrowing model gained 0.009 (95% interval 0.001 to 0.016) over its target-fitted reference when cancers received equal weight (post hoc). Random-effects pooling gave a gain of 0.002 (-0.002 to 0.006), with most weight assigned to cancers where the model made little use of the pretrained score. Choosing the fusion weight on test splits raised the apparent equal-weight gain to 0.017. We reimplemented a published method, VAECox, which showed no pretraining gain over random initialisation at the last or validation-selected training step. Choosing each network's best test step, as the published code does, raised concordance by 0.03 to 0.05 across the 13-cancer and ten-cancer overall-survival settings, but barely changed the difference between networks. In a constructed post hoc experiment, choosing the best test step only for the pretrained network changed the equal-weight mean difference from -0.004 to +0.045 (+0.035 to +0.054). Across seven multi-omics comparisons, estimates from single five-fold runs differed from their cancer's five-run mean by at least 0.02 in 11% to 42% of runs. Concordance was about 0.02 lower at held-out tissue source sites. Interpreting a reported gain therefore requires each model's selection rule, variation across repeated partitions, the weighting of cancers and the evaluation population.

bioinformatics↗