Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.02.04.478979

Reconstructing phylogeny of the hornless rhinoceros Aceratheriinae

Abstract

This study presents the first phylogenetic analysis focused on the Subfamily Aceratheriinae to date, with 391 characters coded from 43 taxa at the species level. We added 77 newly defined and 33 revised characteristics, including features of the skull, teeth, and postcranial bones. In the present analysis, the tribe Teleoceratini, as well as the tribe Aceratheriini, was reclassified within Aceratheriinae, however, the traditionally established monophyly of each tribe was decomposed. Combined with detailed morphological comparisons, we reconstructed the phylogeny of Aceratheriinae and revised the diagnosis of Aceratheriinae. The reported skull and teeth specimens of Turkanatherium from the late Early Miocene indicate that it is not an acerathere and has been placed as a basal rhinocerotid. The Aceratheriinae has undergone evolutionary adaptation several times during the early stage of evolution, and several genera from the Oligocene to the Early Miocene have been reconstructed as early diverging taxa, such as Molassitherium, Protaceratherium, Plesiaceratherium and Chilotheridium; Aprotodon and Mesaceratherium from the Late Oligocene to the Early Miocene were united as the earliest divergent clade of Aceratheriinae; meanwhile, due to the limited materials, the phylogenies of Floridaceras and Dromoceratherium are unstable in this analysis, and both have been tentatively considered as the early diverging clades of Aceratheriinae. Alicornops was reclassified a member of Teleoceratini. Aceratheriini and Teleoceratini have been redefined as two highly specialized groups. Furthermore, Aceratheriini has been divided into two/three clades based on the difference in the skull outlines and the occlusal patterns of the cheek teeth.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

lu, X., Deng, T., Pandolfi, L.. 2022-02-06. Reconstructing phylogeny of the hornless rhinoceros Aceratheriinae. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.04.478979

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Constraining Palaeogeography and Palaeotides for the Cambrian using cnidarian medusae

The ocean tides influence key Earth system processes at a range of spatial and temporal scales. It is known that the geometry of ocean basins is the leading controller of tidal energetics, so well-constrained palaeogeographic reconstructions and tidal properties for Earths past are imperative when investigating other Earth system processes. Here, we present a novel way to constrain both deep-time tidal model results and reconstructions, by combining palaeoecology with sedimentology. We compare new palaeo-tidal model simulations for the Cambrian period, significant for the early origin and radiation of major animal fauna, to tidal proxies. One of the most abundant soft-bodied organisms preserved during this time are cnidarian medusae (jellyfish). A total of 17 cnidarian medusae localities were obtained through the literature, which had an adequate global distribution and occurred at regular intervals throughout the period of study. In some locations there were also estimates of palaeo-tidal range. Our results show a good agreement between the simulations and proxy data. In the few locations where there is disagreement, it is proposed that the palaeogeographic reconstructions are missing details, e.g., island chains, and our results allow for the palaeogeographic reconstructions to be improved. The proxy method presented is promising and can be applied to other time-periods with different marine fossils, particularly at evolutionary and extinction periods where the marginal marine environment is of importance.

paleontology↗

Diving dinosaurs? Caveats on the use of bone compactness and pFDA for inferring lifestyle

Measures of bone compactness in amniote tetrapods of varying lifestyle were used to infer that two spinosaurid dinosaurs (Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, Baryonyx walkeri) were diving "subaqueous foragers," whereas a third spinosaurid (Suchomimus tenerensis) and other sampled nonavian dinosaurs were non-diving terrestrial feeders entering water only as waders. We outline shortcomings in this analysis that involve bone compactness sampling and measurement, lifestyle categorization, the inclusion and exclusion of taxa in the dataset, and flawed statistical methods and inferences. These many shortcomings undermine the evidence used to conclude that two spinosaurid taxa were avid divers. Bone compactness indices remain a valuable tool for interpretation of lifestyle in extinct species when based on sound dataset composition, robust statistical analysis, and consilience with evidence from functional, biomechanical, or paleoenvironmental considerations.

paleontology↗

Zooarchaeological investigation of the Hoabinhian exploitation of reptiles and amphibians in Thailand and Cambodia with a focus on the Yellow-Headed tortoise (Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854))

While non-marine turtles are almost ubiquitous in the archaeological record of Southeast Asia, their zooarchaeological examination has been inadequately pursued within this tropical region. This gap in research hinders a complete comprehension of past human subsistence strategies and economies, as only a limited number of comprehensive studies encompassing all the taxa found in archaeological sites have been conducted thus far. This constraint becomes particularly significant in relation to prehistoric hunter-gatherer populations, who might have extensively utilized inland chelonian taxa. In order to initiate a new approach to the study of past human-turtle interactions in Southeast Asia, we propose an in-depth zooarchaeological analysis of turtle bone remains recovered from four Hoabinhian Hunter-gatherer archaeological assemblages located in Thailand and Cambodia, dating from the Late Pleistocene to the first half of the Holocene. Our study focuses on the bone remains attributed to the Yellow-headed Tortoise (Indotestudo elongata) as it is the most represented taxon in archaeological assemblages in the region of study. For this species, we developed osteometric equations enabling the estimation of the carapace size of the archaeological individuals. This allowed us to study the size structure of the archaeological populations at different sites and to reveal the human exploitation strategies of these animals. We observed a significant taphonomic homogeneity among the studied assemblages, along with similarities in the diversity of hunted reptile and amphibian taxa as well as the size of the exploited tortoises. These findings suggest consistent subsistence behaviors across distinct sites, despite their varying environmental conditions, and raise the possibility of cultural similarities across different periods and regions. Additionally, we provide a baseline for future zooarchaeological studies and a methodological framework for the detailed analysis of archaeological turtle bones in continental Southeast Asia.

paleontology↗