Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.01.20.477155

Integrating Math Modeling, Coding, and Biology in aCURE Lab

Abstract

The development of mathematical and quantitative skills is increasingly critical for biology students. Literacy in coding, statistics, and mathematical modeling enables students to engage in systems-thinking and the analysis of large data sets. Here we present a flexible tool illustrating concepts in mathematical modeling, coding, and biology for integration into both traditional cookbook and inquiry-driven labs for freshmen biology students. We developed simple and complex mathematical models of potato catechol oxidase, a popular system to teach enzyme kinetics in undergraduate biology labs. We integrated both models into a freely-available web app for simulation and parameter estimation. The models are usable even if experimental details are unknown or poorly controlled, so that even novice students can work through the problem. We illustrate this by estimating the kinetic parameters of catechol oxidase in the complex model using data obtained from two sections of a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) freshman biology lab. Worksheets with questions motivating model building and simulation comprehension are provided. The effect of these exercises on students opinions of math, biology, and coding are evaluated using pre- and post-test surveys and student feedback. Our results show that these tools illustrate enzyme kinetics mathematically, students are not intimidated by the degree of math or coding involved, and in some cases are interested to do more, despite being unaware of the focus of the lab when signing up.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dale, R., Craig, S.. 2022-01-24. Integrating Math Modeling, Coding, and Biology in aCURE Lab. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Open-loop lab-on-a-chip technology enables remote computer science training in Latinx life sciences students

Despite many interventions, science education remains highly inequitable throughout the world. Among all life sciences fields, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology suffer from the strongest underrepresentation of racial and gender minorities. Internet-enabled project-based learning (PBL) has the potential to reach underserved communities and increase the diversity of the scientific workforce. Here, we demonstrate the use of lab-on-a-chip (LoC) technologies to train Latinx life science undergraduate students in concepts of computer programming by taking advantage of open-loop cloud-integrated LoCs. We developed a context-aware curriculum to train students at over 8,000 km from the experimental site. We showed that this approach was sufficient to develop programming skills and increase the interest of students in continuing careers in Bioinformatics. Altogether, we conclude that LoC-based Internet-enabled PBL can become a powerful tool to train Latinx students and increase the diversity in STEM.

scientific communication and education↗

Tasting to preserve: An educational activity to promote children's positive attitudes towards intraspecific diversity conservation.

On the edge of causing the sixth big mass extinction event, the development of positive attitudes towards the conservation of intraspecific diversity from early ages is essential to overcome the biodiversity crisis we currently face. However, there is no information available on elementary school students attitudes toward intraspecific diversity conservation nor is there a framework available to perform such analysis. For this study we designed, implemented, and evaluated an educational activity planned for third graders (8 to 13 years old) to explore the intraspecific diversity of vegetables and to promote healthy eating habits. Additionally, a framework was developed to evaluate students attitudes towards intraspecific diversity conservation and applied to semi-structured interviews conducted with students before and after engaging in the educational activity. In this paper we present a reliable framework, developed aligned with the ABC model of attitudes, based on literature, and adapted to elementary school students responses, to evaluate students attitudes toward intraspecific diversity. Our results show that, before the educational activity, most students choose a non-biodiverse option, justifying this choice with the affective component of attitudes: mostly emotional factors but also aesthetic and social/cultural factors. After the educational activity, we observed a significant increase in the frequency of students that choose the biodiverse option and that justified it with the cognitive component of attitudes: mainly with biology and health knowledge factors, but also with economic and ethical knowledge factors. Our findings support the positive impact of educational activities that explore vegetable varieties on students attitudes toward intraspecific diversity conservation.

scientific communication and education↗