Biological regulatory networks are less nonlinear than expected by chance

Manicka, S.; Johnson, K.; Murrugarra, D.; Levin, M.

doi:10.1101/2021.12.22.473903

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.12.22.473903

Biological regulatory networks are less nonlinear than expected by chance

Manicka, S.·Johnson, K.·Murrugarra, D.·Levin, M.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The extent to which the components of a biological system are (non)linearly regulated determines how amenable they are to therapy and control. To better understand this property termed regulatory nonlinearity, we analyzed a suite of 137 published Boolean network models, containing a variety of complex nonlinear regulatory interactions, using a probabilistic generalization of Boolean logic that George Boole himself had proposed. Leveraging the continuous-nature of this formulation, we used Taylor decomposition to approximate the models with various levels of regulatory nonlinearity. A comparison of the resulting series of approximations of the biological models with appropriate random ensembles revealed that biological regulation tends to be less nonlinear than expected, meaning that higher-order interactions among the regulatory inputs tend to be less pronounced. A further categorical analysis of the biological models revealed that the regulatory nonlinearity of cancer and disease networks could not only be sometimes higher than expected but also relatively more variable. We show that this variation is caused by differences in the apportioning of information among the various orders of regulatory nonlinearity. Our results suggest that there may have been a weak but discernible selection pressure for biological systems to evolve linear regulation on average, but for certain systems such as cancer, on the other hand, to also evolve more nonlinear rules.

Explore related subjects

systems biology Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Manicka, S., Johnson, K., Murrugarra, D., Levin, M.. 2021-12-23. Biological regulatory networks are less nonlinear than expected by chance. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.473903

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Peptide-level assay of protein interaction using combinatorial native and denatured proteolysis

Protein protein interactions underlie many extracellular defense and protease regulatory processes, yet identifying their structural interfaces directly in complex biological samples remains challenging. Limited proteolysis coupled with mass spectrometry provides peptide level readouts of local protease accessibility, but linking condition dependent peptide recovery to structural regions in endogenous proteomes requires complementary analysis. Here, we report peptide level assay of protein interaction (PLAPI) using combinatorial native and denatured proteolysis. A single human serum specimen was analyzed in three paired technical preparations using brief trypsin digestion under native conditions and extended digestion after denaturation, followed by isotopic diethyl labeling and LCMS/MS. Applying a 2 of 3 detection rule yielded 920 denatured only peptides and 124 peptides detected under both conditions, with no native only peptides. Mapping to the reference structures placed 13 denatured only C3b peptides at the Factor B binding interface and identified multiple denatured only A2M intersubunit contact regions. Within the A2M bait region, adjacent peptides exhibited different detection patterns; two were detected under both conditions, whereas one was detected only after denaturation. STRING association and enrichment analyses linked the candidate proteins to extracellular defense and protease regulation. These results indicate that PLAPI can provide peptide level evidence for prioritizing structural regions in complex serum samples and guide focused follow up analyses.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗