Identifying control ensembles for decision-making within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic circuit

Abstract

In situations featuring uncertainty about action-reward contingencies, mammals exhibit a high degree of flexibility in adopting strategies for decision-making that are tuned in response to the conditions that they encounter. Although the cortico-basal ganglia thalamic (CBGT) network is implicated in information processing during decisions, it features a complex synaptic architecture, comprised of multiple feed-forward, reciprocal, and feedback pathways, that complicate efforts to elucidate the roles of specific CBGT populations in the process of evidence accumulation. In this paper we apply a strategic sampling approach, based on Latin hypercube sampling, to explore how variations in CBGT network properties, including subpopulation firing rates and synaptic weights, map to variability of parameters in a normative drift diffusion model (DDM), representing algorithmic aspects of information processing during decision-making. Through the application of canonical correlation analysis, we find that this relationship can be characterized in terms of three low-dimensional control ensembles within the CBGT network that impact specific qualities of the emergent decision policy: responsiveness (associated with overall activity in corticothalamic and direct pathways), pliancy (associated largely with overall activity in components of the indirect pathway of the basal ganglia), and choice (associated with differences in direct and indirect pathways across action channels). These analyses provide key mechanistic predictions about the roles of specific CBGT network elements in tuning information processing dynamics during decisions. Author summaryMammals are continuously subjected to uncertain situations in which they have to choose among behavioral options. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic (CBGT) circuit is a complicated collection of interconnected nuclei believed to strongly influence the ability to adapt to environmental changes. The roles of specific CBGT components in controlling information during decisions remains unclear. At a more phenomenological, algorithmic level, drift-diffusion models have been shown to be able to reproduce behavioral data (action selection probabilities and the time needed to make a decision) obtained experimentally from mammals and to provide an abstract representation of a decision policy. In this work, we use simulated decision-making to establish a mapping from neural activity in the CBGT circuit to behavioral outcomes. This mapping illuminates the importance of three core sets of CBGT subnetworks in the action selection process and how they are involved in adapting decision policies across exploitative and exploratory situations.