Enriching for orthologs increases support for Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria sister relationship

Abstract

Conflicting studies place a group of bilaterian invertebrates containing xenoturbellids and acoelomorphs, the Xenacoelomorpha, as either the primary emerging bilaterian phylum, or within Deuterostomia, sister to Ambulacraria. While their placement as sister to the rest of Bilateria supports relatively simple morphology in the ancestral bilaterian, their alternative placement within Deuterostomia suggests a morphologically complex ancestral Bilaterian along with extensive loss of major phenotypic traits in the Xenacoelomorpha. More recently, further studies have brought into question whether Deuterostomia should be considered monophyletic at all. Hidden paralogy presents a major challenge for reconstructing species phylogenies. Here we assess whether hidden paralogy has contributed to the conflict over the placement of Xenacoelomorpha. Our approach assesses previously published datasets, enriching for orthogroups whose gene trees support well resolved clans elsewhere in the animal tree of life. We find that the majority of constituent genes in previously published datasets violate incontestable clans, suggesting that hidden paralogy is rife at this depth. We demonstrate that enrichment for genes with orthologous signal alters the final topology that is inferred, whilst simultaneously improving fit of the model to the data. We discover increased, but ultimately not conclusive, support for the existence of Xenambulacraria in our orthology enriched set of genes. At a time when we are steadily progressing towards sequencing all of life on the planet, we argue that long-standing contentious issues in the tree of life will be resolved using smaller amounts of better quality data that can be modelled adequately.