Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.12.13.472416

Ecology drives the degree of convergence in the gene expression of extremophile fishes

Abstract

Convergent evolution, where independent lineages evolve similar traits when adapting to similar habitats, is a common phenomenon and testament to the repeatability of evolutionary processes. Still, non-convergence is also common, and a major question is whether apparently idiosyncratic, lineage-specific evolutionary changes are reflective of chance events inherent to evolutionary processes, or whether they are also influenced by deterministic genetic or ecological factors. To address this question, we quantified the degree of convergence in genome-wide patterns of gene expression across lineages of livebearing fishes (family Poeciliidae) that span 40 million years of evolution and have colonized extreme environments in the form of toxic, hydrogen-sulfide-rich springs. We specifically asked whether the degree of convergence across lineage pairs was related to their phylogenetic relatedness or the ecological similarity of the habitats they inhabit. Using phylogenetic comparative analyses, we showed that the degree of convergence was highly variable across lineage pairs residing in sulfide springs. While closely related lineages did not exhibit higher degrees of convergence than distantly related ones, we uncovered a strong relationship between degree of convergence and ecological similarity. Our results indicate that variation in the degree of convergence is not merely noise associated with evolutionary contingency. Rather, cryptic environmental variation that is frequently ignored when we employ reductionist approaches can significantly contribute to adaptive evolution. This study highlights the importance of multivariate approaches that capture the complexities of both selective regimes and organismal design when assessing the roles of determinism and contingency in evolution. Significance StatementWhen different species adapt to similar environmental conditions, we frequently observe a mix between shared (convergent) and lineage-specific (nonconvergent) evolutionary changes. Shared changes provide evidence for the repeatability and predictability of evolution. However, it remains unclear whether lineage-specific changes are caused by random forces that limit the predictability of evolution, or whether they reflect deterministic processes shaped by unidentified genetic and environmental factors. By analyzing patterns of gene expression across fishes in extreme environments, we show that the degree of convergence between lineages is related to ecology, indicating that lineage-specific evolutionary changes are not just noise caused by random processes. Thus, acknowledging the complexity of nature in empirical research is critical if we want to predict evolution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tobler, M., Greenway, R., Kelley, J. L.. 2021-12-14. Ecology drives the degree of convergence in the gene expression of extremophile fishes. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.13.472416

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗