Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.29.470294

Students Attitudes Surrounding STEM: A Social Cognitive Career Theory Instrument for High School

Abstract

To broaden participation in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), we must understand the factors that shape perspectives and beliefs around career selection. Good measurement of these factors is crucial to quantify how effectively educational interventions impact student attitudes towards STEM. Adolescents are particularly suited for quantifying intervention efficacy because students build their identities during these formative years and make important career choices. To better quantify intervention efficacy at the high school level, we developed an instrument entitled Student Attitudes Surrounding STEM (SASS), which builds upon the social cognitive career theory (SCCT) framework for understanding career selection. Questionnaire responses were collected from 932 high school students and split into samples of 400 for exploratory factor analysis and 532 for confirmatory factor analysis. The 37 questions clustered into six factors: Self-Efficacy-Experience, Self-Efficacy-Academic, Outcome Expectations, Interests, Negative Perceptions of Scientists, and Career Awareness. Adequate construct validity for the factors indicated in the SASS model was suggested by the fit indices and theoretical considerations. Furthermore, the analyses supported criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. This tool represents a novel integration of three latent variables into SCCT: Negative Perceptions of Scientists, Career Awareness, and an experience factor for Self-Efficacy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

McDonough, E., Sawyer, K. S., Wilks, J., Jacque, B.. 2021-12-01. Students Attitudes Surrounding STEM: A Social Cognitive Career Theory Instrument for High School. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.29.470294

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Correlation Analysis of Demographic Characteristics of Internal Medicine Residents on the Training Effect of Flipped Teaching Based on Video Conference

ObjectiveI aimed to clarify whether the demographic characteristics of internal medicine residents are related to the training effect of Flipped Teaching based on Video Conference, so as to further improve the teaching management and quality control. MethodsA total of 43 residents who participated in the Flipped Teaching based on Video Conference in April and June were included as the research objects. Online examination was conducted for these residents, and the demographic characteristics of these residents and their examination score were quantitatively analyzed, so as to clarify the correlation between the demographic characteristics of these residents and their examination score. ResultsThe average score of 43 residents in the online examination was 72.0(64.0-79.0). 40 residents passed the exam, accounting for 93.0%. The bivariate correlations analysis showed that the age, gender, educational background, training batch and training phase of residents were not correlated with the examination score; all P > 0.05. The age, gender, educational background, training batch and training phase of these residents were not correlated with the examination score by single linear regression and multiple linear regression analysis; all P > 0.05. ConclusionAge, gender, educational background, training batches and training phases of internal medicine residents are not related to the examination score after Flipped Teaching based on Video Conference. Demographic characteristics may not be related to the training effect of residents through preliminary study.

scientific communication and education↗

Social media at metabolic meetings: who is tweeting what and for whom?

BACKGROUNDThe social media site Twitter has been widely embraced in medical circles for its ability to connect individuals and support rapid information sharing. Critics say that the messages shared may not accurately reflect what was said and that sharing meeting content could devalue conferences themselves. It is unclear how it is used at SSIEM and what value it may bring. METHODSTwitters tweetdeck software was used to find all tweets containing the conference hashtag #SSIEM2018. All tweets were reviewed to identify the author, see what had been shared and count replies, likes and retweets. Authors were grouped by professional background and tweet content was broken down by type of material shared and theme. RESULTS122 relevant tweets were sent during the fortnight at the beginning of September 2018, creating over 400,000 impressions. There were a further 73 replies with approximately 13 engagements (likes, replies or retweets) per tweet. 36 people wrote tweets (rate: 3.4 per person [1-33]). One quarter of the tweets shared poster content and over one third of tweets related to Phenylketonuria materials. 50 of the tweets were produced by just two accounts, both intended to provide information to patients and their families. DISCUSSIONTweets where no hashtag was used cannot be identified and restrictions within Twitter prevent certain analyses on tweet data greater than 30 days old. However, Twitter uptake within metabolic medicine is significantly behind other specialities where conference tweets can exceed 20,000. Information shared is typically intended for patients rather than other health professionals; this suggests a different uptake to more mainstream specialities. Presenting teams should be aware that their work may be received directly by patients and families and consider how best to present their messages for all who may receive them.

scientific communication and education↗