Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.11.22.469156

Simultaneous assessment of eight phosphorylated STAT residues in T-cells by flow cytometry.

Abstract

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins are a family of transcription factors controlling functions in immune responses and other cell types. Given their importance, we developed a flow cytometry panel to assess eight phosphorylated STAT residues in human T-cells, including six tyrosine residues across six STAT proteins (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT6) and additional serine residues on STAT1 and STAT3. We applied this protocol to test the in vitro induction of pSTATs in response to CD3/CD28 activation and a panel of recombinant cytokines. We also assessed the pSTAT expression profiles of naive CD4+ T-cells polarized to Th1, Th2, Th17 or iTregs. pSTAT1(S727), pSTAT2(Y689) and pSTAT3(S727) were constitutively expressed in most T-cells, even in the absence of stimulation. For pSTAT1(S727) and pSTAT3(S727), we observed two positive states, high and low. Conversely, expression of pSTAT1(Y701), pSTAT3(Y705), pSTAT4(Y693) and pSTAT6(Y641) were absent in resting T-cells and only expressed with CD3/CD28 activation or with specific cytokines. Variable frequencies of pSTAT5a(Y694) expression were observed in resting T-cells, which increased with activation or specific cytokine stimulation (e.g. IL-2). IFN{beta} stimulation enhanced frequencies of expressing cells for all pSTATs. Correlations among several pSTATs, particularly pSTAT1(S727)high and pSTAT3(S727)high were observed. While polarization resulted in increases in canonically associated pSTATs, other non-canonical pSTAT changes were also observed. Collectively, we developed, optimized, and tested a sensitive and rapid approach for simultaneously assessing phosphorylation of six STAT proteins. Using this approach, we made several novel observations of T-cell pSTAT induction in response to stimuli.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Monk, E., Vassallo, M., Burke, P., Weber, J., Chattopadhyay, P., Woods, D.. 2021-11-22. Simultaneous assessment of eight phosphorylated STAT residues in T-cells by flow cytometry.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.469156

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗