Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.10.04.462011

Reactivating Memories from a Mathematical Task over a Period of Sleep

Abstract

Sleep, especially slow-wave sleep (SWS), has been found to facilitate memory consolidation for many types of learning. Mathematical learning, however, has seldom been examined in this context. Solving multiplication problems involves multiple steps before problems can be mastered or answers memorized, and thus it can depend on both skill learning and fact learning. Here we aimed to test the hypothesis that memory reactivation during sleep contributes to multiplication learning. To do so, we used a technique known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR), or the pairing of newly learned information with specific stimuli that are later presented during sleep. With TMR, specific memories can be reactivated over a period of sleep without disrupting ongoing sleep. We applied TMR during an afternoon nap to reactivate half of the multiplication problems that had previously been practiced. Results showed no effect of TMR on response time or accuracy of multiplication problem solving. Because these results were unexpected, we also used a variation of this paradigm to examine results in subjects who remained awake. Comparisons between the wake and sleep groups showed no difference in response time or accuracy in either the initial test or the final test. Although neither TMR nor sleep differentially influenced multiplication performance, correlational analysis provided some clues about mathematical problem solving and sleep. On the basis of these findings, even though they did not provide convincing support for our hypotheses, we suggest future experiments that could help produce a better understanding of the relevance of sleep and memory reactivation for this type of learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bassard, A. M., Paller, K. A.. 2021-10-05. Reactivating Memories from a Mathematical Task over a Period of Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.462011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Novel Tau Interaction Partners as Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Alzheimers disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to cognitive decline and ultimately death. One of the main hallmarks of this disease is the accumulation of pathological tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles. To better understand these pathological mechanisms, it is essential to characterize the tau protein interactome in health and disease. In this study, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screening using a human brain cDNA library, from which we identified 15 novel tau-interacting proteins that bind to full-length human tau, or its fragments: the N-terminus, microtubule-binding domain, or C-terminus. We subsequently validated these novel interactions using in vitro co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization assays with both physiological and pathological tau isoforms. Furthermore, their interactions with the human tau protein were analyzed using surface plasmon resonance. Finally, an in silico interactome analysis of these newly discovered tau-binding partners revealed several additional interactors that can link them to downstream processes critical to neurodegenerative pathways Our findings offer fresh insights into tau biology and highlight novel targets for therapeutic intervention and biomarker development.

neuroscience↗

Early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for temporal attention: A TMS study

Temporal attention enhances the selective processing of information at a specific point in time and improves perception. Previous neuroimaging studies investigating its neural mechanisms have either conflated temporal attention with temporal expectation or provided correlational evidence. Thus, whether early visual cortex is functionally necessary for temporal attention remains unknown. Here, we combined psychophysics with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine whether V1/V2 are functionally necessary and play a causal role in temporal attention. Observers performed an orientation-discrimination task in which two consecutive stimuli, T1 and T2, were presented in the periphery, preceded by a precue providing either valid or neutral temporal information. Double-pulse TMS was delivered under four conditions: at T1 (T1-TMS), at T2 (T2-TMS), at both T1 and T2 (both-TMS), or not at all (none-TMS), to assess its effects on temporal attention and the efficacy of the stimulation was verified by pupil size analysis. Behavioral results revealed robust temporal attention benefits on d', reaction time, and the Balanced Integration Score (BIS) across all four TMS conditions, indicating that the benefits of temporal attention were unaffected by occipital TMS. Furthermore, pupil dilation was largest in the both-TMS condition, followed by the T1-TMS and T2-TMS conditions, and smallest in the none-TMS condition, providing physiological verification of the stimulation protocol. Together, these findings reveal the first causal evidence that the early visual cortex is not functionally necessary for endogenous temporal attention.

neuroscience↗

Disentanglement of persistent and dynamic neural substrates of working memory

Competing theories of working memory have alternatively emphasized the importance of persistent and dynamic substrates of this cognitive function. Here, we directly tested these theories by computationally isolating the contributions of persistent and dynamic activity to working memory. We analyzed neuronal population activity recordings in macaques doing match/non-match working memory tasks. We first extracted signatures of persistent and dynamic activity through cue-specific temporal means, temporal principal components, and correlations of activity patterns across task epochs. We then generated synthetic data constrained by these signatures, and decoded cue stimuli from these data, separately from persistent and non-persistent neurons. We found that high decoding performance arose from a nuanced interplay of persistent and dynamic activity. Specifically, we could decode stimuli at empirical or above-chance levels across all tasks only from persistent neurons, but only after constraining correlations of activity patterns across epochs. In this way, we showed distinct roles for persistent and dynamic neuronal activity that help to unify two competing theories of working memory. More broadly, we also advanced computational controlled experiments as a principled framework for adjudicating between competing models of neuronal population activity.

neuroscience↗