Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.09.07.459261

Immunity vs Sociality: Adaptive evolution tests suggest social lifestyle exerts greater selection pressures than host-pathogen coevolution in the bees

Abstract

Hosts and their parasites and pathogens are locked in antagonistic co-evolution. The genetic consequence of this can be seen in the rates of adaptive evolution in immunologically important loci in many taxa. As the risk of disease transmission increases we might also expect to see greater rates of adaptive evolution on genes of immune function. The evolution of sociality and its elaborations in insects represent enormous shift in disease transmission risk. Here, we examine whether sociality in the bees corresponds to changes in the rate of adaptive evolution in both classical canonical immune genes, and genes with putative immune functions identified from meta-analyses of honey-bee transcriptomic responses to infection. We find that measures of gene-wide adaptive evolution do not differ among canonical immune, non-canonical candidate immune, and background gene sets, but that branch-site adaptive evolution does increase with sociality regardless of gene category. Solitary species have greater rates of adaptive evolution in canonical immune genes than background genes, supporting the suggestion that social immune mechanisms may instead be the site of host-pathogen co-evolution in social species. We identify three genes with putative roles in immunity that warrant further attention (Vitel-logenin Vg, disks large 1 tumour suppressor, and the uncharacterised protein LOC100577972). There are more gene family changes after the origin of sociality across all gene classes, with contractions occur-ring after the elaboration of sociality to complex eusociality. There are few genes or functions under adaptive selection that appear to be shared outside of specific lineages, suggesting that evolution of the immune system may be specific to individual species and their pathogen interactions. SignificanceInfectious disease drives rapid evolution of immune genes, but infection risk should be much higher in social species. To examine whether greater sociality drives faster immune system evolution we compared the rate of immune gene evolution in solitary, social, and highly eusocial bees. To account for possible novel immune genes in bees, we analysed classical immune genes alongside candidate immune genes inferred from other studies. Surprisingly, we find that solitary bees have the highest rate of immune gene evolution relative to background genes but that sociality is associated with rapid evolution across the whole genome. These findings suggest that 1) accelerated immune gene evolution is not universal, 2) immune gene evolution is moderated by sociality in that solitary species invest more into immune gene change, and 3) that social genomes are highly dynamic, which may obscure evolution at immunological loci. The types of immune genes and functions appear mostly lineage-specific, regardless of sociality, suggesting individual evolutionary his-tories exert more selection pressure than general patterns of greater pathogen exposure introduced by social living.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mee, L., Barribeau, S.. 2021-09-08. Immunity vs Sociality: Adaptive evolution tests suggest social lifestyle exerts greater selection pressures than host-pathogen coevolution in the bees. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.07.459261

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗