bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.08.15.456414
Reconsidering the validity of transcriptome-wide association studies
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) aim to detect relationships between gene expression and a phenotype, and are commonly used for secondary analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results. Results from TWAS analyses are often interpreted as indicating a geneticrelationship between gene expression and a phenotype, but this interpretation is not consistent with the null hypothesis that is evaluated in the traditional TWAS framework. In this study we provide a mathematical outline of this TWAS framework, and elucidate what interpretations are warrantedgiven the null hypothesis it actually tests. We then use both simulations and real data analysis to assess the implications of misinterpreting TWAS results as indicative of a genetic relationship between gene expression and the phenotype. Our simulation results show considerably inflated type 1 error rates for TWAS when interpreted this way, with 41% of significant TWAS associations detected in the real data analysis found to have insufficient statistical evidence to infer such a relationship. This demonstrates that in current implementations, TWAS cannot reliably be used to investigate genetic relationships between gene expression and a phenotype, but that local genetic correlation analysis can serve as a potential alternative.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
de Leeuw, C., Werme, J., Savage, J., Peyrot, W. J., Posthuma, D.. 2021-08-15. Reconsidering the validity of transcriptome-wide association studies. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.15.456414
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.