Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.08.13.456220

INTEGRATE: Model-based multi-omics data integration to characterize multi-level metabolic regulation

Di Filippo, M.·Pescini, D.·Galuzzi, B. G.·Bonanomi, M.·Gaglio, D.·Mangano, E.·Consolandi, C.·Alberghina, L.·Vanoni, M.·Damiani, C.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Metabolism is directly and indirectly fine-tuned by a complex web of interacting regulatory mechanisms that fall into two major classes. First, metabolic regulation controls metabolic fluxes (i.e., the rate of individual metabolic reactions) through the interactions of metabolites (substrates, cofactors, allosteric modulators) with the responsible enzyme. A second regulatory layer sets the maximal theoretical level for each enzyme-controlled reaction by controlling the expression level of the catalyzing enzyme. In isolation, high-throughput data, such as metabolomics and transcriptomics data do not allow for accurate characterization of the hierarchical regulation of metabolism outlined above. Hence, they must be integrated in order to disassemble the interdependence between different regulatory layers controlling metabolism. To this aim, we proposes INTEGRATE, a computational pipeline that integrates metabolomics (intracellular and optionally extracellular) and transcriptomics data, using constraint-based stoichiometric metabolic models as a scaffold. We compute differential reaction expression from transcriptomic data and use constraint-based modeling to predict if the differential expression of metabolic enzymes directly originates differences in metabolic fluxes. In parallel, we use metabolomics to predict how differences in substrate availability translate into differences in metabolic fluxes. We discriminate fluxes regulated at the metabolic and/or gene expression level by intersecting these two output datasets. We demonstrate the pipeline using a set of immortalized normal and cancer breast cell lines. In a clinical setting, knowing the regulatory level at which a given metabolic reaction is controlled will be valuable to inform targeted, truly personalized therapies in cancer patients. Author summaryThe study of metabolism and its regulation finds increasing application in various fields, including biotransformations, wellness, and health. Metabolism can be studied using post-genomic technologies, notably transcriptomics and metabolomics, that provide snapshots of transcripts and metabolites in specific physio-pathological conditions. In the health field, the transcriptome and, more recently, the metabolome have been broadly profiled at the pre-clinical and clinical levels. The informative power of single omic technologies is inadequate since metabolism regulation involves a complex interplay of regulatory steps. While gene expression regulates metabolism by setting the upper level of metabolic enzymes, the interaction of metabolites with metabolic enzymes directly auto-regulates metabolism. Therefore there is a need for methods that integrate multiple data sources. We present INTEGRATE, a computational pipeline that captures dynamic features from the static snapshots provided by transcriptomic and metabolomic data. Through integration in a steady-state metabolic model, the pipeline predicts which reactions are controlled purely by metabolic control rather than by gene expression or a combination of the two. This knowledge is crucial in a clinical setting to develop personalized therapies in patients of multifactorial diseases, such as cancer. Besides cancer, INTEGRATE can be applied to different fields in which metabolism plays a driving role.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Di Filippo, M., Pescini, D., Galuzzi, B. G., Bonanomi, M., Gaglio, D., Mangano, E., Consolandi, C., Alberghina, L., Vanoni, M., Damiani, C.. 2021-08-13. INTEGRATE: Model-based multi-omics data integration to characterize multi-level metabolic regulation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.13.456220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Choice of annotation data significantly impacts automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

Genome-scale metabolic models are valuable tools for studying metabolism in many applications, such as metabolic engineering or understanding human disease. However, curated models are available for only a limited number of organisms, and generating high-quality models for additional organisms remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, several software tools have been developed that can produce draft models in an automated fashion, but the quality of these draft models lags behind manually curated ones. Thus, there is still a need to improve these tools. Previous work has focused primarily on developing better methods for each step in the reconstruction process, such as gene annotation and gap-filling. Here, we focus on the data that underlies these methods, such as known connections between protein sequence and function. We find that changing the source of reconstruction data has a substantial impact on the contents and predictions of generated models. In fact, the source of data can have a bigger impact than the choice of reconstruction method. Additionally, we show that the reconstruction process is sensitive to the accuracy of gene annotations in the reconstruction data. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of having functional annotation data from an organism that is closely related to the one for which a model is being built. These observations highlight the importance of reconstruction data and identify principles that should be considered when selecting data for reconstruction tools.

systems biology↗