Natural and after colon washing fecal samples: the two sides of the coin for investigating the human gut microbiome

Abstract

To date there are several studies focusing on the importance of gut microbiome for human health, however the selection of a universal sampling matrix representative of the microbial biodiversity associated to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, still represents a challenge. Here we present a study in which, through a deep metabarcoding analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, we compared two sampling matrices, feces (F) and colonic lavage liquid (LL), in order to evaluate their accuracy to represent the complexity of the human gut microbiome. A training set of 37 volunteers was attained and paired F and LL samples were collected from each subject. A preliminary absolute quantification of total 16S rDNA, performed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), confirmed that sequencing and taxonomic analysis were performed on same total bacterial abundance obtained from the two sampling methods. The taxonomic analysis of paired samples revealed that, although specific taxa were predominantly or exclusively observed in LL samples, as well as other taxa were detectable only or were predominant in stool, the microbiomes of the paired samples F and LL in the same subject hold overlapping taxonomic composition. Moreover, LL samples revealed a higher biodiversity than stool at all taxonomic ranks, as demonstrated by the Shannon Index and the Inverse Simpsons Index. We also found greater inter-individual variability than intra-individual variability in both sample matrices. Finally, functional differences were unveiled in the gut microbiome detected in the F and LL samples. A significant overrepresentation of 22 and 13 metabolic pathways, mainly occurring in Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, was observed in gut microbiota detected in feces and LL samples, respectively. This suggests that LL samples may allow for the detection of microbes adhering to the intestinal mucosal surface as members of the resident flora that are not easily detectable in stool, most likely representative of a diet-influenced transient microbiota. This first comparative study on feces and LL samples for the study of the human gut microbiome demonstrates that the use of both types of sample matrices may represent a possible choice to obtain a more complete view of the human gut microbiota in response to different biological and clinical questions.