Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP - using real data from pigs

Abstract

BackgroundEmpirically assessing the impact of preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations of preselected animals requires comparison of scenarios taking into account different approaches, including scenarios without preselection. However, preselection almost always takes place in animal breeding programs, so it is difficult to have a dataset without preselection. Hence most studies on preselection used simulated datasets, concluding that genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) from subsequent single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) evaluations are unbiased. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of genomic preselection (GPS) on accuracy and bias in subsequent ssGBLUP evaluations, using data from a commercial pig breeding program. MethodsWe used data on four pig production traits from one sire line and one dam line. The traits are average daily gain during performance testing, average daily gain throughout life, backfat thickness, and loin depth. As these traits had different weights in the breeding goals of the two lines, we analyzed the two lines separately. Per line, we had a reference GPS scenario which kept all available data, against which the next two scenarios were compared. We then implemented two other scenarios with additional layers of GPS by removing all animals without progeny either i) only in the validation generation, or ii) in all generations. We conducted subsequent ssGBLUP evaluations per GPS scenario, utilizing all the data remaining after implementing the GPS scenario. In computing accuracy and bias, we compared GEBV against progeny yield deviations of validation animals. ResultsResults for all traits in both lines showed marginal loss in accuracy due to the additional layers of GPS. Average accuracy across all GPS scenarios in both lines was 0.39, 0.47, 0.56, and 0.60 respectively for the four traits considered in this study. Bias was largely absent, and when present did not differ greatly among corresponding GPS scenarios. ConclusionAs preselection generally has the same effect in animal breeding programs, we concluded that impact of preselection is generally minimal on accuracy and bias in subsequent ssGBLUP evaluations of selection candidates in pigs and in other animal breeding programs.